File talk:WikiProject Scouting barnstar.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This thing looks like a condom. --Descendall 05:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • No it doesn't. It looks like a merit badge with a start on it, which is what it is. And if it does, so what? Wiki has pictures of human genitalia. Rlevse 13:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Something else is going on here, though I can't figure out what. User talk:Alphax closed the debate and deleted the page that Descendall went back and added the comment on again. Could someone explain to be why Descendall hasn't faced some discipline for this actions? --Evrik 14:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because he hasn't done anything wrong? Alphax restored the initial comment at my request so as to start this thread over after he realised delete was a bad close. As I counseled you, I'd not dig into asking for "disciplinary actions" were I you. ++Lar: t/c 17:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Is that a threat? Seriously. His initial posting is a breach of civility. Since I was initially figuring the post was proof of Hanlon's razor, I didn't take it too seriously, but really ... I think that most people involved in Scouting would see the humor, but it is bordering on offensive. --Evrik 17:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • A threat? hardly! I'm just saying that I did not see the intial posting as incivil but your reaction to it was perhaps actually more inappropriate. The more you dig into this, the worse I suspect it is going to make you look, at least to some folk. This is a terrifically minor matter that you give the appearance of plowing into a rather large mountain. Really, let this go. There's nothing here to be outraged about. ++Lar: t/c 20:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This thing does not look like a condom, although I can see why you might think so, Descendall. To me it looks like a US Boy Scout merit badge. Like it's supposed to! If it does look like a condom, it's just a coicidence, and what of it? No big deal. We are not censored and there is encyclopedic need for this to exist as is, I think. ++Lar: t/c 17:08, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary[edit]

Fools, all of you:

  • Descendall for being an ass (have you seen his Abu Ghraib pics?)
  • Evrik for overeacting and not doing the right thing the first time.
  • Lar for being an insensitive lout (and for threatening Evrik
  • User:Alphax for not having the balls to do the right thing.

The last two give admins a bad name. 205.188.116.199 22:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]