From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Berlin image[edit]

I guess there is few to discuss. The reasons for introducing a recognisible Berlin photo are countless. As there were no arguments from the editors who constantly revert the improvements, the only conclusion is an abuse of administrator status. Lear 21 22:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

You are the only editor who is constantly reverting against 3 other users. Guess who is doing the edit-war. --BLueFiSH 23:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Look up what Wikipedia is not [1]. Especially when no arguments are stated. The image is of superior content. And guess what, the three reverting editors know that. I´m going to introduce the image tommorrow. And be prepared to have at least 10 good arguments for another revert. The other more likely option two of the three editors have is to lock up the page the next five years ... Lear 21 00:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

To me, it's more than questionable whether the discussed image is of "superior content". The current status should be kept. - And yes, me too will look up for the page. --Mazbln 05:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
So you are stating that you will do edit-war for the next five years? Nice. Nice argument to block your account. --BLueFiSH 08:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

@BLueFiSH: Abusive threat ignored. No arguments against image reintroduction = reintroduction. Very easy. Lear 21 13:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The combination of COA and the image should be acceptable for everyone. Lear 21 21:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Doesn't look very good[edit]

This article is a complete mess. Why an Earth every title and heading is translated to multiple languages? Confusing. -- 20:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)