Template talk:GFDL-invariants
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2007
[edit]Can someone write the reason why is it a copyright violation to use this licence? It's too easy to copy the text from the {{Copyvio}}, but this template appers to be more specific... Yuval Y § Chat § 22:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- @Yuval Y: Eight years later, this is rather odd in comparison with the permitted {{GFDL-IS}}. Apparently "invariant" in the sense of (partial) CC BY-ND is evil, and "invariant" in the sense of (partial) CC BY-SA is okay. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Unclear speedy
[edit]How about replacing everything by…
<includeonly>[[Category:Possibly unfree images]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Category:License review tags]]</noinclude>
…because a permitted {{GFDL-IS}} and a speedy {{GFDL-invariants}} is unsafe, e.g., ISBN 3-8316-0609-9 File:Zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in virtuellen Gemeinschaften.pdf contains (or contained if deleted) one "invariant" Alexa graph. Is this a good attribution, a COM:DM MUST NOT modify a graph as shown by Alexa eight years ago, an evil case of ND, or simply irrelevant wasting the time of a {{License review}}er? –Be..anyone (talk) 17:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)