User:Kwj2772/temp3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

이 문서에서는 외부에서 자신의 웹사이트나 인쇄용 등으로 위키미디어 공용의 자료를 이용하는 것에 대한 내용을 다룹니다. 위키미디어 공용은 자유롭게 사용할 수 있는 미디어 저장소라는 것에 주목해 주십시오.

위키미디어 재단은 위키미디어 프로젝트에 있는 자료의 저작권을 소유하고 있지 않으며, 대부분 일반 사용자가 저작권을 갖고 있습니다. 다만, 대부분 자유 라이선스에 따라 개별적으로 허가를 받지 않고도 자유롭게 사용할 수 있도록 허용되어 있습니다. 따라서 라이선스 조건에 명시된 범위를 벗어나지 않는다면 저작권자에게 이용 허락 선언을 구하지 않아도 됩니다.

그림의 저작권과 라이선스 정보가 정확할 것이라 생각하지만, 위키미디어 재단은 저작권이나 라이선스 정보의 정확성에 대한 어떠한 보증도 하지 않습니다. 위키미디어 공용에 있는 파일을 이용하기 전에 저작권 정보를 확인해 보시기 바랍니다.

저작권 이외의 제한 규정이 적용될 수 있습니다. 여기에는 상표권, 특허권, 인격권, 저작인격권, 사생활보호권 등 저작권과는 무관하게 법적으로 보호받는 권리로 관할 국가에 따라 매우 다를 수 있습니다.

Other restrictions may apply. These may include trademarks, patents, personality rights, moral rights, privacy rights, or any of the many other legal causes which are independent from copyright and vary greatly by jurisdiction.

위키미디어 프로젝트의 자료 라이선스[edit]

[edit]

위키뉴스를 제외하고는 위키미디어 프로젝트에 올려진 모든 글은 작성자가 저작권을 갖고 있으며 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시-동일조건변경허락 3.0GNU 자유 문서 사용 허가서에 따라 이용할 수 있습니다. 작성자 개인이 저작권을 갖고 있으므로 다른 자유 라이선스나 PD로 배포할 수도 있습니다.

위키뉴스는 크리에이티브 커먼즈 저작자표시 2.5 (CC-BY)를 따릅니다.

그림[edit]

위키미디어 공용의 대부분의 그림은 CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, GFDL 등의 자유 라이선스나 퍼블릭 도메인으로 배포됩니다. Commons:라이선스를 참고하십시오.

그림을 클릭하면 파일의 설명 문서를 보여 주게 됩니다. 여기에 올린이, 저작권 정보, 저작권자와 라이선스에 대한 정보가 나와 있습니다.

비자유 자료 인용 (위키미디어 공용에는 허용되지 않음)[edit]

경고: 위키미디어 서버 내의 일부 자료는 자유 라이선스로 배포되지 않습니다. 특히 영어 위키백과의 경우는 미국 저작권법의 "공정 사용" 조항에 따라 비자유 자료를 사용할 수 있게 허용하고 있습니다. 그러한 자료를 이용하기 전에 당신이 이용하려는 자료가 "비자유 자료 인용"과 관련이 있는지 확인하고 저작권자의 허락을 받으십시오. 비자유 자료 이용은 웹상에 있는 아무 그림이나 퍼오는 것과 다르지 않습니다.

위키미디어 재단 로고[edit]

위키미디어 재단과 위키미디어 프로젝트의 로고 (위키백과나 공용 로고)는 위키미디어 재단이 저작권과 상표권을 갖고 있습니다. 이는 보도 자료로 사용이나 위키미디어 프로젝트에 관한 미디어 외의 다른 목적으로의 사용이 허용되어 있지 않습니다. 관할 국가에 따라 교육적 목적으로의 공정 사용이 가능할 수 있습니다. 다른 용도로 사용하려면 위키미디어 재단에 문의하십시오.

How to comply with the licenses[edit]

The sections below are summaries of the licenses, and how to comply.

If a work is published under a single license, all of the terms in that license must be followed. If a work is multi-licensed (that is, released under more than one license), re-users may choose which license's terms they wish to follow. Except for materials believed to be in the public domain, a link to the full text of the license(s) is included on the image description page. Some licenses also have a summary available.

Please read the full licenses for legal details. Neither the Wikimedia Foundation nor the creators of material on Wikimedia sites provide legal advice. If you need information about how a license applies to your particular situation, you should contact a suitable legal professional in your jurisdiction.

Public domain[edit]

Content marked as public domain (or local equivalent, e.g. "may be used for any purpose") is material believed to be out of copyright, either because of expiration of the original copyright, or because the material has been explicitly released into the public domain by its creator(s).

Note that inalienable moral rights and other restrictions may still apply in some countries for some uses.

It is common for publishers to take public domain works and republish them under their own copyright. This may be legal, but it does not affect the public domain status of the original image. If you tag the image with its origin (where you got it and where it came from originally) and the name of the creator, this can help us if a dispute with such a publisher arises later.

GNU licenses[edit]

GNU Free Documentation License[edit]

For simple redistribution, include the version you were given access to and its complete history with attribution, and include the GFDL (linked on the same website or reprinted in print). Compliance is easy on websites or in books, but (presently) difficult for leaflets, magazines or newspapers.

Re-users are free to make derivative works and copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, even commercially. To comply, (a) release your version under the GFDL, (b) credit all the authors or content creators (if you have a title page, also at least the five most substantial ones there) and (c) include a complete copy of the GFDL. In the case of derivative works you must also include the complete history section.

How you determine which five authors are considered to be substantial for the purpose of the GFDL is not defined in a legal sense. We suggest using one consistent method such as edit count, word count, hours contributed to the content, or something of a similar nature.

Any derivative works must stay under the GFDL.

When using a photo placed under the GFDL licence as part of a larger work, the larger work *does not have to be* released under GFDL for usage to be within the license terms. The Free Software Foundation, creators of the GFDL license, has been asked for clarification of how much of e.g. a book counts as the "larger work" in these terms; they responded that no synopsis can substitute for what the text of the license says, and if in doubt the reuser should seek a proper legal opinion. Now, the GFDL says "When the Document is included in an aggregate, this License does not apply to the other works in the aggregate which are not themselves derivative works of the Document." So, the larger work doesn't (always) have to be released under GFDL.

GNU, GPL, and LGPL[edit]

The GNU General Public License (GPL) and Lesser General Public License (LGPL) are computer software licenses and are not usually used for text or media. However, some content on Commons (e.g. icons or screenshots from computer programs) is under the GPL or LGPL.

For simple redistribution of such material, including altered versions, (a) release your version under the same license (b) supply the source version, i.e. something as editable as what you started with (e.g. image file, GIMP .xcf file, etc.).

Note that the GNU General Public License (GPL) and the GNU Free Document License (GFDL) are not compatible with each other. That means that content licensed under the GFDL as well as content licensed under the GPL can't be used together simultaneously in the same "work" — e.g. GPL computer program source embedded in GFDL explicatory text. However, a GPL image in a GFDL text page is usually regarded as an aggregation of two works rather than a single work.

Creative Commons[edit]

Most Creative Commons licenses are not free content licenses and will not be found as the sole allowable licence on Wikimedia Commons. The following are allowed and will be found here:

CC-BY[edit]

In the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY), re-users are free to make derivative works and copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, even commercially.

You must attribute the work to the author(s), and when re-using the work or distributing it, you must mention the license terms or a link to them. You may choose whether to make future modified versions available under CC-BY.

CC-SA[edit]

In the Creative Commons Share Alike license (CC-SA), re-users are free to make derivative works and copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, even commercially.

When re-using the work or distributing it, you must mention the license terms or a link to them. You must make your version available under CC-SA.

CC-BY-SA[edit]

In the Creative Commons Attribution and ShareAlike license (CC-BY-SA), re-users are free to make derivative works and copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, even commercially.

When re-using the work or distributing it, you must attribute the work to the author(s) and you must mention the license terms or a link to them. You must make your version available under CC-BY-SA.

Other free content licenses[edit]

See Commons:Copyright tags#Copyleft Attitude Licenses and Commons:Copyright tags#Other free tags.

Contacting the uploader or writer[edit]

If you wish to use content under terms other than the license stated, or to absolutely verify copyright status if you feel you need to, the person who put it onto a Wikimedia server may be able to assist.

The writer of a piece of text will be the person who made the edit putting it in the text; see the "history" tab for the page. The uploader of an image or piece of media is the person who placed it on a Wikimedia server — either the original content creator or someone who brought free content here from elsewhere. The uploader is named on the "file history" portion of the image description page.

In some cases, you may be able to contact the uploader to find out more about an image's copyright status. The original creator of the image may be willing to grant additional permissions. Uploaders occasionally have access to higher resolution images than those present on the servers, particularly of their own work.

The Wikimedia Foundation generally cannot assist in locating users who have contributed material. You can try to contact them yourself in a number of ways:

  1. Some have contact information, such as a name and address or phone number, on their user page.
  2. Some can be contacted by email by clicking the "email this user" link listed in the toolbox on their user page.
  3. You can leave a message on their talk page by clicking on the "discussion" tab at the top of the user page, and then clicking the "+" tab that appears next to the "edit" tab once the discussion page is visible. Enter your message and click "save." (Your message will then be visible to the public).

Own MediaWiki installation[edit]

Since MediaWiki revision 1.13.0 you can direct embed media from Wikimedia Commons into your own MediaWiki-based wiki. Add the following lines to the localSettings.php of your installation:

$wgForeignFileRepos[] = array(
   'class'            => 'ForeignAPIRepo',
   'name'             => 'shared',
   'apibase'          => 'http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/api.php',
   'fetchDescription' => true, // Optional
);

Now you can embed images directly from Wikimedia Commons without the need to copy it to your own server. The File: page for the image will pull the full image information from Commons.

See Manual:$wgForeignFileRepos for further technical implementation details.

Hotlinking[edit]

Hotlinking is allowed from Wikimedia servers. For hotlinked files, it is still good practice to add attribution as you would for copies on your own server.

Note that hotlinking a thumbnail is unreliable, as these are generated and cached - you should copy these to your own server.

Note also that anyone could change, vandalise or delete a hotlinked image - on your own server you will have control over what is served.

Wikimedia generally does not allow 'hot spider' services, where each time someone performs a search on their site, the query is redirected to our site. Outside reusers should either copy the content one item at a time or contact the Foundation regarding a live feed (which can be arranged as a paid service).

Feedback after use[edit]