User talk:AntiCompositeBot

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Chennai Beach Station With Trains.png[edit]

hello I added a link to Chennai Beach Station With Trains.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer2433986 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Addition of new article copyright[edit]

Hi I added the image: Ferdinando Alessandri.png but the bot said the copyright was invalid, even though it wasn't because I got it from the official site. I wish you could take a look. Grateful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luis1250Xx (talk • contribs) 21:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image has no copyright[edit]

Hi, my image I've uploaded of a Finnish Arado Ar 196 has been flagged for incomplete license. Its from the private collection of Michael Birch, the son of Norman Basil Stafford Birch - who was a photographer and took this image in Finland in 1944, but never published it. I really don't know how to work all the licenses or how this comes under public domain - but all I know is this image comes from a private collection with permission and has no copyright status. How do I fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxLousada (talk • contribs) 00:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thimble-case-spc-collections-2040x1000-1.jpg[edit]

Hello. The bot has tagged this image. This image is in the public domain as stated by the source, Bowdoin College, that uploaded the image. This may have been tagged because I wasn't sure how to add a public domain license to this picture. Thanks, Evedawn99 (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Balhuticaris voltae.jpg & File:Balhuticaris voltae reconstruction.jpg[edit]

Hello, I went onto the new Balhuticaris wiki page, and noticed there were no images. So I decided to go to the paper on Balhuticaris Voltae, and checked the copyright before adding the images onto the page. I then noticed sometime after that the bot flagged these images because 'no copyright tag was decided'. Of course, the issue is I couldn't find the copyright tag itself (plus this is my first time uploading images, so I may have done something wrong). The copyright tag is stated below.

When clicking on this link https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=ELS&contentID=S2589004222009476&orderBeanReset=true&orderSource=Phoenix, which is the copyright for the paper on Balhuticaris written by Alejandro Izquierdo-López and Jean-Bernard Caron on the 15th July 2022, it states that,

'This article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND license and permits non-commercial use of the work as published, without adaptation or alteration provided the work is fully attributed.'

Since these images are not being used for commercial use, this means I do not need to seek permission from the copyright holders, Alejandro Izquierdo-López and Jean-Bernard Caron, to use these images for non-commercial use (i.e. on the Balhuticaris wiki page). It'll be fantastic if these images could have the 'speedy deletion' tag removed, and possibly the addition of the 'CC-BY-NC-ND' copyright license on the bot to make sure further incidents like this don't happen.

Thanks, DevonHalDraedle (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These images are copyvio, meaning that they cannot be used on Commons without a useable CC license. Patachonica (talk) 20:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Have you ever read Commons:Licensing? This clearly writes like this. The following restrictions must not apply to the image or other media file: "Non-commercial, educational, personal, or editorial use only." Read "Summary of Creative Commons licenses on Wikimedia Commons" in that page. This clearly shows that licenses like "CC BY-NC" or "CC BY-NC-ND" are not allowed on Commons. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 03:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pope Paul VI Travels.svg[edit]

Hello, I am writing to you because you inserted information about the lack of license about the photo with map of apostolic journeys of Paul VI. I don't know if you noticed but I corrected and added the template with the license and another user corrected the page. Now this template about the lack can I remove myself or leave I have you ? Greetings Kamil.ryy (talk) 10:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Kamil.ryy You could remove the tag yourself, but I have done so for you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]