User talk:Jarekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Notice
Joshua Trees in Joshua Tree NP 2.jpg

Unless you request otherwise, I will reply on this page to messages posted on this page. Add it to your watchlist!
If I left a message on your talkpage, regarding missing license and you would like to contact me please check my FAQ page first. If you still have a question, please leave a note on the bottom of this talk page by clicking Add topic link on the top right of the page. It would be very helpful if you mention the file in question using [[:File:file name.jpg]] format and sign your name by adding "~~~~".

FYI author photos[edit]

Tech News: 2020-20[edit]

20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

PGNiG uploads[edit]

Hi Jarek, greetings from Warsaw. Could you please have a look at this versus this, and two other twin PGNiG uploads of this User? Thank you. Boston9 (talk) 13:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

✓ Done--Jarekt (talk) 02:18, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Katherine young 5182935.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Katherine young 5182935.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

null edit using awk[edit]

Hi, your bot recently created some file decription pages of deleted files. I.e. File:CSX 5359 at Altanta, GA on June 10, 1987 (22146057823).jpg. There seems to be somehing wrong. Can you check this please. --JuTa 17:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

PS: Other examples you can find on Commons:Database reports/Blank single-author pages and some old versions of this. --JuTa 17:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

User:JuTa Thanks for letting me know. Due to phabricator:T245349 every file I add SDC statement to have to be purged. I purge files using AWB to add a line to the end of the file description. The edit is ignored but a file is purged. My bot does that for every file I add SDC statement to. It seems like my AWB mush not have "skip when page does not exist" option turned on and the file was moved between the time I generated the list and did the edit. I will make sure to check that option. Thanks. --Jarekt (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rob sheer 5182795.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Rob sheer 5182795.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rob sheer 5182795.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Rob sheer 5182795.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rob sheer 5182795.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Tech News: 2020-21[edit]

17:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Issue with template or module Artwork[edit]

Jarekt, I think you are the only one editing Module:Artwork. In Commons:Forum User:Stepro pointed to two issues he noticed in File:Paula Moderson-Becker - Selbstbildnis am 6 Hochzeitstag - 1906.jpeg:

  • The title was twice visible. User:Giftzwerg 88 fixed this in Special:Diff/420156949/420181590 by editing the structured data, but this should not have happened before.
    Side remark: Not a mistake, but I have noticed that in Template:Information when there is an empty description, but a caption in structured data exists, meanwhile the latter use instead. Seems to be quite similar to me.
  • The geo coordinates (for location of museum) are not displayed correctly. Another example is the template use in Category:Last Supper by Leonardo da Vinci (found by Ralf Roletschek – I do not ping him, because according to himself he does not understand English). In both cases the coordinates are fine in Wikidata.

— Speravir – 00:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Speravir, Thank you for letting me know.
label QS:Len,"Self-portrait on the 6th wedding anniversary"
". Yes that is wrong. I will look into it.
Thank you. I mentioned {{Information}} just for comparison, thank you here for the further info. — Speravir – 18:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:A B Alexandrov.jpg[edit]

Hi Jarekt. Please could you kindly close the above discussion? It appears to be showing a "keep" consensus, and it has not been edited since February. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 08:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@Storye book: I am sorry but if I vote in the DR than I never close it, so it does not appear like I am advocating and judging. --Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I didn't realise that. Storye book (talk) 08:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Questionnaire invitation (a new tool to be developed, to verify media data)[edit]

Hi there, I'm developing a tool to assist users in verifying (structured) data of media on commons.

To understand the community's needs, I would like to invite you to participate in this questionnaire: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScbNdJdQYN1yBvEeKne48eWDU6SBsdlUfNBAmZyvUEBkCR1Gg/viewform?usp=sf_link. It should take ~2 minutes.

Thanks a lot. :D

(You received this message as you seems to have experience with structured data on Wikimedia projects.)

-- Gabrielchl (talk) 23:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Update for Commons:List of primary license tags[edit]

Hello Jarekt,
Years ago you created Commons:List of primary license tags. The GFDL was droppen from the list as acceptable licences as only licence for on files. Are there any plany to update the list or does this list represent all licences without any status information if they can be used as single licence or not. --D-Kuru (talk) 15:04, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

I updated the list, the best I could. The purpose of the list is to monitor changes to Category:Primary license tags (flat list) which lists all valid license templates. Any template on the list should be sufficient to be used as the only license in the file. The list does not distinguish between templates which were depreciated but still allowed for old files and templates which can be used on new uploads. --Jarekt (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

photo license[edit]

Hi Jarekt, thisthis edit makes the photo license unvisible.

Thanks, I fixed the file. The reason was that the file had 2 alternative names for the same field. --Jarekt (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
I see, thank you. Raymond 18:45, 22 May 2020 (UTC)