User talk:Jarekt
|
Empire of Brazil Flag
[edit]Hi Jarekt! Could you move delete and redirect File:Bandeira do Império do Brasil com nó e cores corretos.svg to File:Bandeira Imperial oficial (com heráldica certa).svg (which i have requested to be moved to "File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg") Feitidede (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Feitidede, sorry I was traveling last week and did not see your request. I would like to understand your request better. I see 2 similar svg files:
- File:Bandeira do Império do Brasil com nó e cores corretos.svg (eng. "Flag of the Empire of Brazil with correct knot and colors", last updated by you) is now called File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- File:Bandeira Imperial oficial (com heráldica certa).svg (eng. "Official Imperial Flag (with correct heraldry)" maintained by User:Almanaque Lusofonista)
- There is also few dozens of other variations in Category:Flags of the Empire of Brazil. I am a bit confused of what are the differences between them. It seems like number of stars, style and color of the knot, details of leaves berries and flowers. Maybe we need a gallery page comparing variants of the flag and matching SVG to JPG/PNG to historic depictions and photographs. Than we can work on properly naming the files. --Jarekt (talk) 21:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- I will make a gallery with them on a sandbox and explain what each of them represent, please refer to User:Feitidede/Brazil Feitidede (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've finished the gallery and inserted instructions on what needs to be done Feitidede (talk) 21:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I will make a gallery with them on a sandbox and explain what each of them represent, please refer to User:Feitidede/Brazil Feitidede (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Feitidede, Thank you for the gallery, it was quite helpful. I moved it to National flags of the Empire of Brazil so it can be helpful to others. So to be very clear, you are asking to:
- Rename File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- universally replace File:Bandeira Imperial oficial (com heráldica certa).svg with the renamed File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- universally replace File:Flag of Brazil (1870–1889).svg with the renamed File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- Rename File:Bandeira do Brasil no padrão correto (1822 - 1853).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1822-1853).svg
- universally replace File:Flag of Brazil (1822–1870).svg with the renamed File:Bandeira do Brasil no padrão correto (1822 - 1853).svg
--Jarekt (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I actually replaced the File:Flag of Brazil (1822–1870).svg with the new and better version of the flag, so yes:
- Rename File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- universally replace File:Bandeira Imperial oficial (com heráldica certa).svg with the renamed File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- universally replace File:Flag of Brazil (1870–1889).svg with the renamed File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- Rename File:Flag of the Empire of Brazil (1853-1889).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1853-1889).svg
- But please:
- Rename File:Flag of Brazil (1822–1870).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1822-1853).svg
- universally replace File:Bandeira do Brasil no padrão correto (1822 - 1853).svg with the renamed File:Flag of Brazil (1822–1870).svg.
- Rename File:Flag of Brazil (1822–1870).svg -> File:Flag of Brazil (1822-1853).svg
- Feitidede (talk) 21:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Feitidede I think I am Done. Please check if I got it right. --Jarekt (talk) 03:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think you still need to universally replace File:Flag of Brazil (1870–1889).svg with File:Flag of Brazil (1853-1889).svg. I'm just afraid I should've actually overwritten the 1870-1889 file with the new one and renamed it to 1853-1889...
- Feitidede (talk) 12:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Feitidede I think I am Done. Please check if I got it right. --Jarekt (talk) 03:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Flag of PUK
[edit]Hey there Jarekt, excuse me for bothering you with global replace requests: File:Flag of PUK.png needs to be globally replaced with File:Flag of PUK.svg; Apparently it is one of the most used raster flags that did not have a svg version. Thanks in advance! Feitidede (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Feitidede, Done --Jarekt (talk) 13:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Tl Valid SVG
[edit]Hi Jarekt,
There is a minor issue, related to default parameter url in {{Valid SVG}}. I've looked in the source code and I'm not sure that I would submit a correct Edit request… Do you think you could help in adjusting the setting?
--Kontributor 2K (talk) 12:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Template:Colour blind accessible
[edit]Hi, it seems as you had some part in Template:Colour blind accessible which appears when I upload a file/map like this File:Map_for_Passante_ferroviario_di_Napoli.svg. I have tryed to understand how to use it or why it appears but I need help to understand what to do etc. Thankful for info. --please ping me-- Goran tek-en (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Hawks Nest Tunnel disaster - 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 08:57, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Hawks Nest Tunnel Disaster (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 09:07, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Hawks Nest Tunnel disaster - 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
⸺Randomstaplers (en talk) 09:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-03
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- The Single User Login system is being updated over the next few months. This is the system which allows users to fill out the login form on one Wikimedia site and get logged in on all others at the same time. It needs to be updated because of the ways that browsers are increasingly restricting cross-domain cookies. To accommodate these restrictions, login and account creation pages will move to a central domain, but it will still appear to the user as if they are on the originating wiki. The updated code will be enabled this week for users on test wikis. This change is planned to roll out to all users during February and March. See the SUL3 project page for more details and a timeline.
Updates for editors
- On wikis with PageAssessments installed, you can now filter search results to pages in a given WikiProject by using the
inproject:
keyword. (These wikis: Arabic Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage, French Wikipedia, Hungarian Wikipedia, Nepali Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia) [1] - One new wiki has been created: a Wikipedia in Tigre (
w:tig:
) [2] - View all 35 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, there was a bug with updating a user's edit-count after making a rollback edit, which is now fixed. [3]
Updates for technical contributors
- Wikimedia REST API users, such as bot operators and tool maintainers, may be affected by ongoing upgrades. Starting the week of January 13, we will begin rerouting some page content endpoints from RESTbase to the newer MediaWiki REST API endpoints for all wiki projects. This change was previously available on testwiki and should not affect existing functionality, but active users of the impacted endpoints may raise issues directly to the MediaWiki Interfaces Team in Phabricator if they arise.
- Toolforge tool maintainers can now share their feedback on Toolforge UI, an initiative to provide a web platform that allows creating and managing Toolforge tools through a graphic interface, in addition to existing command-line workflows. This project aims to streamline active maintainers’ tasks, as well as make registration and deployment processes more accessible for new tool creators. The initiative is still at a very early stage, and the Cloud Services team is in the process of collecting feedback from the Toolforge community to help shape the solution to their needs. Read more and share your thoughts about Toolforge UI.
- For tool and library developers who use the OAuth system: The identity endpoint used for OAuth 1 and OAuth 2 returned a JSON object with an integer in its
sub
field, which was incorrect (the field must always be a string). This has been fixed; the fix will be deployed to Wikimedia wikis on the week of January 13. [4] - Many wikis currently use Cite CSS to render custom footnote markers in Parsoid output. Starting January 20 these rules will be disabled, but the developers ask you to not clean up your MediaWiki:Common.css until February 20 to avoid issues during the migration. Your wikis might experience some small changes to footnote markers in Visual Editor and when using experimental Parsoid read mode, but if there are changes these are expected to bring the rendering in line with the legacy parser output. [5]
Meetings and events
- The next meeting in the series of Wikimedia Foundation Community Conversations with the Wikimedia Commons community will take place on January 15 at 8:00 UTC and at 16:00 UTC. The topic of this call is defining the priorities in tool investment for Commons. Contributors from all wikis, especially users who are maintaining tools for Commons, are welcome to attend.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.