User talk:Racconish

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Opinion?[edit]

Hi, Racconish, as you have been involved in the review of various Hannah Arendt photos, may I ask what is your expert opinion of this Flickr photo. It appears to be licensed with CC BY 2.0, and the photo appears on various other sites stating the same author and licence. Would that be OK to upload in Commons, or do you think it is nonetheless questionable? Antilope (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Antilope, the photo is on Getty' image bank with credits to the Bettmann Archive, with a mention of 1963. [1] This might indicate it comes from a press agency. — Racconish💬 17:20, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, as far as I can see, that's a clearly a different photo, albeit most likely taken at the same occasion. But I guess you mean that it does raise doubts about the authorship. Antilope (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes, that's exactly right. — Racconish💬 19:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrator[edit]

Hi, Racconish. You work often with media of the day. But main page is fully cascade-protected, so if a mistake is discovered in today's media of the day, then you cannot repair it, because you are not an administrator. Do you want to become an administrator? Taivo (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Taivo, thanks for the suggestion. This would at least allow me to speedy delete my own uploads with typos instead of giving the hassle to somebody else Clin. I appreciate the local tradition of proposing somebody else for adminship. Should you feel confident enough to propose my name to the community, I would feel honored. — Racconish💬 18:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Now I created a request in Commons:Administrators. Taivo (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrator[edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Offert au nouvel administrateur par ses confrères…

Félicitations Racconish ! Tu es maintenant pourvu des droits d'administrateur sur le site. Avant de te lancer dans les effacements de page, protections de page, blocages de compte ou modifications de pages protégées, il n'est pas inutile de relire attentivement la page Commons:Administrateurs et de placer dans ta liste de suivi les pages s'y rapportant (notamment Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, Commons:Demandes de suppression). La plupart des actions d'administrateurs sont réversibles par les autres sysops, à l'exception des fusions d'historiques qui doivent donc être traitées avec précaution.

Il est possible de discuter directement avec d'autres admins sur IRC : #wikimedia-commons @ irc.freenode.net. Il existe également un canal dédié aux admins de Commons, qui peut être utile pour les sujets sensibles ou la coordination entre administrateurs : #wikimedia-commons-admin.

Tu peux également rejoindre #wikimedia-admin, le canal de coordination inter-wiki pour les administrateurs Wikimedia. Demande à n'importe quel channel operator de t'accorder une dispense d'invitation (alternativement n'importe qui sur le canal peut t'y inviter temporairement). Tous les admins de tous les projets y sont bienvenus.

La lecture de Commons:Guide to adminship peut s'avérer enrichissante.

Merci de vérifier ou d'ajouter ton nom à la liste des administrateurs et les autres listes, par langue et par date, qui y sont mentionnées.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Oops, je n'avais même pas vu ta candidature. Félicitations ! Yann (talk) 14:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Merci EugeneZelenko et Yann. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 14:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Shooting 'Film Ghetto Theresienstadt'.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Shooting 'Film Ghetto Theresienstadt'.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Catrìona (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Motd/2018-11-03[edit]

Hi, I am writing to let you know that the song (its other version) has been already chosen MOTD for 24th September, so perhaps you might consider changing the MOTD for 3rd November. --jdx Re: 03:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks Jdx. — Racconish💬 07:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Aw horachmim (1909).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Tuválkin 00:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Confusion over File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png vs. File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png[edit]

I'm a bit confused by your recent renaming of File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png back to File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png, and I think it may have been a mistake. The file is obviously a 32×32 grid, but it was originally uploaded as File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png. It was nominated for deletion on the basis that the name was wrong, so I renamed it (under citerion 3: obvious error) to File:Pattern Grid 32x32.png. You have now closed the deletion request Symbol keep vote.svg Keep, and renamed the file back to File:Pattern Grid 40x40.png, "per request". Is this a simple mistake, or is there some request for renaming back to what appears to be an incorrect name? --bjh21 (talk) 17:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

bjh21, my bad. Thanks for pointing it out. — Racconish💬 18:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Motd/2018-11-15[edit]

I don't think the English description is proper. AFAIR in this context "by John Bowers" means "directed by John Bowers", but according to the IMDB page Bowers played "just" male main role. --jdx Re: 22:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks Jdx. The subtleties of the Polish genitive being unfortunately beyond my grasp, I leave you with apologies the burden of fixing the Polish MOTD description. — Racconish💬 06:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)