User talk:Tacsipacsi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You have repeatedly combined non-related discussions[edit]

previously special:diff/626587862. subsequent repetition will be reverted without further explanation. RZuo (talk) 06:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RZuo: You have repeatedly separated the topic by adding a nonsense blank headline [1] [2] (without any explanation ever, so why do you stress now that you won’t explain it in the future?). And the comment you so much want to put in a separate section was a reply to your comment (see also the edit summary), so your claim about being non-related is simply wrong. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RZuo and Tacsipacsi: The reply appears to be unrelated and oos, can we just dispense with it?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: you're in the best position to handle your own discussions. i only make sure offtopic stuff is kept away from topical discussions. RZuo (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I probably would’ve reverted it in December if you didn’t reply to it. However, if it remains, it should remain as one section. Either we regard the comment as serious and keep it, but then respect it by not arbitrarily separating it from the comment it’s a reply to, or we handle it as off-topic and don’t keep it at all. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 13:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Edit summary OOUI.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Edit summary OOUI.png

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Edit summary OOUI.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]