Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Accès plage, Sainte-Marie, Ré island, august 2015.jpg

File:Accès plage, Sainte-Marie, Ré island, august 2015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2015 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Accès plage, Sainte-Marie, Ré island, august 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Accès plage, Sainte-Marie, Ré island, august 2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jebulon (talk) 14:23, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support The sky is a little bit noisy but I love the composition and the colours. --Code (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 17:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Strong, earthy colors we don't often see in beach photos. Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 07:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 11:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Something refreshing after all. Its good. --Mile (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Not symmetrical... ;-) Had FPC been anonymous, I couldn't have told this is from Jebulon. Very interesting. - Benh (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Nothing special or wov IMO. Impressive for an Eskimo, but not for me. QI, but fp? Because the shadows? Are not images be accepted because the author and not the image? Sorry, it's not beautiful IMO. Not more wov than File:Castro de Baroña. Camiño de acceso visto no sentido contrario. Porto do Son. Galiza 326.jpg: I don't understand what is FP, sorry--Lmbuga (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Sorry. es: Seguramente no he debido hacer el anterior comentario, aunque sea lo que pienso--Lmbuga (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment You must not be a regular over here, or you won't say things like "Are not images be accepted because the author and not the image?". As a matter of fact, Jebulon and I often disagree, so I don't quite get you here. Photo is also about mood, and lighting (just search the root of the word "photo"...), and that photo is quite good in that regard (to me). Commons is not only focused on encyclopedic content. - Benh (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• Gracias (en: thanks): I have more than 2.010 quality pictures and only more than 12 featured pictures because I can't understand and I am nobody. To me the author is very important--Lmbuga (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
• es: Gracias. Pero esta discusión no es adecuada aquí. Lo siento, sorry; but I think that I'm right--Lmbuga (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• De nada. ;-) And It's OK sometime to digress a little (look at the church num below :D). I hope you are not too serious. I personally try not to look at how many FP people have when I judge a photo, and this case appart, I don't think anyone cares much about that. If you feel this is not FP I think you should oppose (and I hope author won't mind that I said this). - Benh (talk) 21:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC).

• Respuesta es inútil --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Be bold, Luis Miguel, and oppose ! This is your pure right ! But please have a look to most of my recent nominations, and you will see how many of them I've withdrawn due to no chance of success, and how many failed at the end of the process. And you will be less personal I think...--Jebulon (talk) 21:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• (You know my problem with English). I don't have -I think that you know- problem with you. My only problem is I do not understand anything in FP. Sorry. I beg you to forget me. Sorry. --Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
• es: Lo siento, no entiendo que en una página internacional se pueda aceptar un criterio como "wov" que responde casi unicamente a la adscrición cultural del que opina. Ese criterio no es objetivo. Por suerte, no hay mucho esquimal entre ustedes, porque todo sería "wov". Sin embargo, son los más de ustedes muy parecidos y unos pocos son capaces de imponer su criterio (un criterio cultural que no coincide con el mío generalmente). ¿Que es un criterio cultural?, cultural es decidir lo que es bello y lo que no lo es. Lo siento: He debido quedarme callado--Lmbuga (talk) 22:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support es: Porque, a pesar de que la imagen carece de exclusivo y significativo valor para absolutamente ningún espacio o página alguna, es lo que parece desear la comunidad de Commons.

es: Votar en contra no es valentía. Valentía es reconecer que no se pinta nada en la comunidad, aceptarlo y obrar consecuentemente. Y abandonar... o volver a abandonar--Lmbuga (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry for Google es:@Lmbuga: Luis Miguel, su persona y su voto cuente tanto como los otros aquí. Una "imagen de calidad" es una "imagen de calidad", ya que tiene cualidades técnicas .... Una imagen se convierte en un FP porque agrada, además de sus características. Sinceramente, creo que esta imagen es un FP, ya que tiene más cualidades y mas dificultades, pero nos vemos, nos guste menos. No estoy de acuerdo, pero es así. Gracias por sus comentarios ti. Un abrazo.--Jebulon (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I don't feel that I should support this picture since it is nothing but it is beautiful and that should be enough. Besides that it remembers me Arcachon in August, it was exactly like this. So what? It's a wow. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 21:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places