User talk:Lmbuga
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Edificios entre O Carril e Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-53.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Praia de Portugalete. O Carril. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-54.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Escudo na Igrexa de San Bieito. Cambados SB14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good--Jebulon 18:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Escultura no tellado da Igrexa de San Bieito. Cambados SB17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
like the light contrast between the sunny statue and shady foreground --Carschten 18:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Porto do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
QI for me. --Kadellar 22:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Peto de ánimas - Vilanova dos Infantes - Celanova - Galiza VI.01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 15:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Río Arnoia - Allariz A32.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Thanks: I like your work--Lmbuga 01:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC) |
[edit] Traduction
¡Hola Miguel!
Like you, I may traduce the sentence (in french), but I don't understand. It has no sense for me, sorry. It seems to make the difference between the subject of the picture, and the photograph itself. We have to judge the photographs, but when there is nothing special in the photography (technically), we have to judge only the subject. Or something like that. Or the contrary. Maybe. Perhaps. Tal vez. Quizais.--Jebulon (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Request
Have a request. Look please at the photos in the category Saint George Cathedral in Gus-Khrustalny, and mark the removal of what is unacceptable to Wikimedia.
I can delete the downloaded pictures me, or removal is possible only through a request to delete?
Alexxx1979 (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-52.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality to me. --NorbertNagel 23:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Yes, very good.--Jebulon 11:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Very good (white structure partially hidden, but ugly. It's a pity).--Jebulon 11:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-53.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
QI for me. --Aleks G 22:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-39.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Lembrando a Celso Emilio Ferreiro - Celanova - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 09:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
QI IMHO. I don't see problem. --T137 01:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Beautifully, good colour. --Aleks G 00:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --Kadellar 13:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G24.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-31.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |
|
Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
I prefer the older version colours, everything's actually grey. Contrast change is better. --Kadellar 20:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Thank Aleks. . Contrast change is better, but I'm not sure what is the real color; but better to me--Lmbuga 16:52, 5 February 2012 (UTC) |
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-38.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Guindastres no porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Igrexa de Santiago de Allariz - Galiza A09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
QI for me --PierreSelim 12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
|
[edit] Re:Hola
Las llaves finales (}}) no estaban, por eso la foto no aparecía. Ya está solucionado Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Araña Mandaio 07-0-2006 10.jpg. No sé si les parecerá mala la foto, pero desde luego esa araña tiene una cara de mala... :) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Detalle do Mosteiro de San Salvador de Celanova - provincia de Ourense - Galiza.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
|
[edit] Quality Image Promotion
|
Congratulations! File:Superficie de cemento dunha columna.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments
Good quality and interesting idea :). --PierreSelim 12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Done--Lmbuga 21:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC) |
|
Congratulations! File:Barco pesqueiro. O Carril. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-55.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. |