User talk:Lmbuga

• User talk:Lmbuga/Discusións anteriores

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Edificios entre O Carril e Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-53.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Praia de Portugalete. O Carril. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-54.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Escudo na Igrexa de San Bieito. Cambados SB14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good--Jebulon 18:32, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Escultura no tellado da Igrexa de San Bieito. Cambados SB17.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments like the light contrast between the sunny statue and shady foreground --Carschten 18:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Porto do Carril-Vilagarcía de Arousa-Galicia-20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 22:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Peto de ánimas - Vilanova dos Infantes - Celanova - Galiza VI.01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 15:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Río Arnoia - Allariz A32.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Comment Not bad, but it is a lot of dust in the sky (lens) especially from the right, also it is possible to improve still something. I offer such variant, on your discretion. ;) --Aleks G 23:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)  Support --Aleks G 17:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks: I like your work--Lmbuga 01:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Traduction

¡Hola Miguel!

Like you, I may traduce the sentence (in french), but I don't understand. It has no sense for me, sorry. It seems to make the difference between the subject of the picture, and the photograph itself. We have to judge the photographs, but when there is nothing special in the photography (technically), we have to judge only the subject. Or something like that. Or the contrary. Maybe. Perhaps. Tal vez. Quizais.--Jebulon (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Absolutely no molestias, my friend !--Jebulon (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Request

Have a request. Look please at the photos in the category Saint George Cathedral in Gus-Khrustalny, and mark the removal of what is unacceptable to Wikimedia.

I can delete the downloaded pictures me, or removal is possible only through a request to delete?

Alexxx1979 (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:42, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-52.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality to me. --NorbertNagel 23:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Yes, very good.--Jebulon 11:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very good (white structure partially hidden, but ugly. It's a pity).--Jebulon 11:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-53.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 22:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-39.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:29, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lembrando a Celso Emilio Ferreiro - Celanova - Galiza-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI IMHO. I don't see problem. --T137 01:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Beautifully, good colour. --Aleks G 00:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 13:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:El Golfo - Lanzarote - G24.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-31.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me (It is possible even to add a few contrast ;)) --Aleks G 23:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks--Lmbuga 21:27, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Los Hervideros - Lanzarote - LH10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Comment If a little to correct balance white and to add contrast the photo will probably look more interesting, I offer such variant (the file is updated) ;) --Aleks G 23:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC) I prefer the older version colours, everything's actually grey. Contrast change is better. --Kadellar 20:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) Thank Aleks. . Contrast change is better, but I'm not sure what is the real color; but better to me--Lmbuga 16:52, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Arrecife. Lanzarote-38.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Question Good quality. Don't you think, the sea (lower part of the photo) should be cropped to some extent? --NorbertNagel 20:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)  Done You're right, thanks--Lmbuga 21:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Guindastres no porto de Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galiza-V14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Comment I offer such variant, is a bit brighter (a file is updated) ;) --Aleks G 15:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Igrexa de Santiago de Allariz - Galiza A09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me --PierreSelim 12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Hola

Las llaves finales (}}) no estaban, por eso la foto no aparecía. Ya está solucionado Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Araña Mandaio 07-0-2006 10.jpg. No sé si les parecerá mala la foto, pero desde luego esa araña tiene una cara de mala... :) Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Detalle do Mosteiro de San Salvador de Celanova - provincia de Ourense - Galiza.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Support QI for me

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Superficie de cemento dunha columna.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality and interesting idea :). --PierreSelim 12:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment Nice, but is is possible to provide some more information about the subject and location? --NorbertNagel 10:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Done--Lmbuga 21:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Barco pesqueiro. O Carril. Vilagarcía de Arousa. Galicia-55.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Too dark? Bad composition? Unsharp?--Lmbuga 22:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC). OK to me. --Iifar 07:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)