Comment Image needs perspective correction. The windmills in the right are tilted. --Halavar 14:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Done, 30 steps of perspective correction!, but in my opinion, in this case, only with a frontal of rear view of the turbines (windmills), the turbines are straight. Better now? I'm not sure because in the reality the windmills are tilted. --Lmbuga 15:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC) Support Yes, better now. Good work. QI for me. --Halavar 15:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
QI. But who is he? -- Spurzem 22:17, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I only was in Zaragoza three hours and with company of 38 students (only 2 teachers). I could not investigate the identity. I hope that others can fix it--Lmbuga 21:59, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Bronze sculpture dedicated to painter Francisco de Goya (by Federico Mares, 1960) --Livioandronico2013 19:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Concordo contigo em que o processo de promoção das QI é tão importante como das FP e em como há muitas imagens que são promovidas sem o merecer. O problema é que tornar o processo semelhante ao das FP agravaria muito o problema actual de excesso de imagens e falta de avaliadores. Não entendi bem o que queres dizer no final do teu comentário. Tencionas abandonar o forum? Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
QIC é uma atividade que se tornou menos importante para mim. Hoje eu sei que qualquer coisa pode ser QI, então eu tenho que selecionar as imagens válidas antes de sugerir a QIC. Eu faço isso porque eu quero ter em Category:Quality Images by Lmbuga boas fotos, mas é só o meu critério.
Não se pode criticar em QIC: Todo mundo aceita tudo. No final um se sente sozinho.
O último dia em que eu esteve presente em QIC, eu declinaria mais de sete imagens promovidas. Mas eu odeio ser raro, melhor deixar o projecto, pois eu não quero inimigos. Tudo seria diferente se nós nos acompañarmos entre nós. Obrigado--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:40, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Vou continuar propondo e promovendo algumas imagens. Vou tentar não declinar nenhuma, mas é dificílimo porque vejo e tenho o meu critério. Obrigado. Gosto das suas imagems--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Hya, I modified your oppose of Rolf. The procedure is to delete the surplus nominations. Hence, I deleted nominations 6-10 of Rolf and set the oppose among nominations 1-5 back to "Nomination". I hope, you are ok with that. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok Cccefalon. Thanks. I pretended not to eliminate any proposal which users had thought (or wrote), but I'm agree with you. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Many thanks for your reviews , , , ! Next time I hope the football match does not take place under floodlights, but in the studio, so I can take pictures that meet your quality standards. I still can see some pictures at the candidates, where you can agree with contraindications. Regards --Steindy (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
WAV, you're a beautiful friend, Steindy: ...--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 22:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!