Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avenue des Champs-Elysées from top of Arc de triomphe Paris.jpg

File:Avenue des Champs-Elysées from top of Arc de triomphe Paris.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2014 at 10:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Avenue des Champs-Elysées from top of Arc de triomphe Paris.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Avenue des Champs-Elysées from top of Arc de triomphe Paris.jpg

•  Info created & uploaded by Jebulon - nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
•  Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 10:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 11:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

• The opponents convinced me, I change to  Neutral --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:03, 04 January 2014 (UTC)
  • C'est ton droit le plus strict, mais c'est un coup de poignard dans le dos d'une inélégance crasse.--Jebulon (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support And again I change, I'm not an inelegant murderer... --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 04 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you very much Paris 16 for surprising and unexpected nomination !--Jebulon (talk) 12:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice view, but it's oversatured and has obvious lacking sharpness, even QI is questionable in this case --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support great photo. Tomer T (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice shot, but lacking some sharpness. I wouldn't request too much of this, since it's hard to get it so nicely sharp, but sharpening it a little more would be good. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:27, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Some sharpening added. One can read the name of the subway station, and count the number of cobblestones on the ground. Please see annotation. --Jebulon (talk) 16:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I don't see any difference (sorry if I'm blunt here). But I do find that viewing it on the file's description page is good. :) (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 10:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
      • Sorry I don't understand your comment. A cache purge problem ?--Jebulon (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
        • Sorry, unfortunately it does not seem so. I opened 2 tabs, with 1 tab containing the full size of the older version and the other the full size of the newer version. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 14:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose (weak)Looks as if the farer part of Champs-Elysées is in shadow (see note). Is it due to a cloud? For me the photo has a lot of Wow in thumbnail size but is somehow distappointing in full size. Sharpness of the foreground is good, but the last third is in shadows / dust and looks imho unfavourable and lacks sharpness. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, the shadow is due to a cloud. The avenue is almost 2 km long, and it is impossible to have an uniform light.--Jebulon (talk) 17:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
    • But I guess the weather in Paris is much better than in most parts of Germany :) Watching for a moment where parts of the Champs-Elysées are not under a cloud should be no big deal and makes for me the difference between FP and non-FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
      • Amen. (it is raining a lot because of a storm during the time I write this. No way for me to take another picture tonight, sorry. And october was very nice in Bavaria, far much better than in Paris (see following pictures, coming soon)...--Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Having looked at it at 100%, unfortunately, I have to agree with Wladyslaw. --A.Savin 18:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose: I'm normally very pleased with Jebulon's work, but Wladyslaw is right, here the quality is not good, even with the resolution being fairly low for such a "large" view. A reproducible shot, no reason not to anticipate a better photograph. Julia\^talk 11:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
  • "Reproducible shot" ? I'm a Parisian, and it was my first time at the top of the Aec de Triomphe ! And who will pay for the ticket ? Maybe I'll ask Wikimedia France for a support ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
    • I can't speak for Wikimedia France, but it's the kind of thing that Wikimedia UK would give "microgrants" for. You should ask your chapter!  :) Julia\^talk 20:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral +:view, -:lack of sharpness Poco² 11:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral +:view and color, -:lack of sharpness --Claus (talk) 07:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /Leitoxx 15:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes