Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg

File:Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2020 at 18:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR_alt.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR alt.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The movements of cars in the lower part distract the composition, my recommendation is to use different layers and eliminate the ghosts --Wilfredor (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

  Wilfredor: I've indeed removed some ghots in the version below Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- amuzujoe (Talk) 1:20, 16 January 2020 (GMT)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - The urban activity is at the bottom of the photo and doesn't distract me; it's part of the atmosphere. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I didn't like this in thumbnail size but viewed in full it's a good shot, very sharp and lots of nice details. Ghosting is IMO not severe although there are a few bits where aliasing could be dealt with better. Cmao20 (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment There seem to be ghosts in the right centre foreground. 10:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose ghosts and HDR artefacts are too distracting for me. --Ivar (talk) 11:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I've fixed a slight tilt, regarding the ghost, tricky, will see if I can do something about that. Thank you Tomer for the nom! Poco a poco (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

  Tomer T, I've uploaded an edited version of the file with less ghosting, what do you think? should we offer it as an alternative to the original one? up to you, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

  Of course, added. Tomer T (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

  Tomer T: I've improved the version below and will keep my support there and remove it here to try to tip the balance in that direction Poco a poco (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support--Ermell (talk) 08:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Basílica_Notre-Dame,_Montreal,_Canadá,_2017-08-11,_DD_20-22_HDR_Edit.jpg

3816

328

317

2590

4920

4557

CCW tilt

•  Comment alt by Poco a poco - reduced ghosting. Tomer T (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 22:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support also. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan Poco a poco (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Right tower has CCW tilt, walking legs on the left, couple artefacts still there (notes added). --Ivar (talk) 06:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

  Ivar: If not completely fixed I've made some improvements in this version following your notes. Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral much better now, but some ghosts are stil there. --Ivar (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 08:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Qualified support That lean on the right can, and should, be corrected. Other than that I'm OK ... this picture is meant to show the church at night and it works very well in that department. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A sharp and great photo. ----Wright Streetdeck 06:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment this vote may be problematic to close, choosing the image with higher support and consensus. Pinging voters: @Wilfredor, Amuzujoe, Gnosis, Johann Jaritz, and Aristeas: . Tomer T (talk) 23:10, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment pinging more voters: @Ikan Kekek, Cmao20, Iifar, Poco a poco, and Ermell: . Tomer T (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment pinging more voters: @Daniel Case, Tournasol7, and Streetdeck: . Tomer T (talk) 23:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Hard for me to choose between the two. I'll defer to everyone else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
• The original takes it for me, on the basis that the alt doesn't completely eliminate the ghosts (so doesn't have that much of an advantage there) and is also noticeably less sharp and detailed than the original on the building itself. Cmao20 (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:39, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral Si bien el problema de los fantasmas ha sido mejorado, sigo observando un problema de perspectiva, observa los autos de la parte inferior derecha, por ejemplo totalmente aplastados. Saludos --Wilfredor (talk) 21:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

The chosen alternative is: File:Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg

8 support 2 oppose, against 8 support 2 neutral. Tomer T (talk) 20:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)