Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canal Bourgogne vers Fulvy.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Canal Bourgogne vers Fulvy.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2014 at 20:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info A view of the Burgundy Canal (canal de Bourgogne), between two locks, in a spring day. All by Myrabella
- Support -- Myrabella (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 08:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Excellent composition. The reflection on the water makes the difference to an otherwise trivial (good) photograph. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Per Alvesgaspar. I would like to know how to catch such landscapes so nicely.--Jebulon (talk) 19:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Slaunger (talk) 10:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I am not attracted by this image --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Per Alvesgaspar.--Godot13 (talk) 18:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very good composition and lighting. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose beautiful reflection, but bad cut and hideous first floor, the definition is nice but this is a double-edged sword: it creates a real punch in the eye that bush. It occupies part too much to be ignored, very unbalanced, too. --Pava (talk) 01:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- To me, it matters to show the vegetation growing on the banks, because flora of the rivers banks is often quite specific. So we can consider that on the contrary, it may add encyclopedic value. --Myrabella (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- this is a photo art, not documentary, just look angle, looking for suggestions and comments of other users, is a picture that wants to capture emotion, does not lead the reader to analyze the flora .. and the research of emotional, is unfortunately ruined by a disharmony, for me. Without the left side of the picture would be completely different, and that's what I think the goal that he wanted to get the photographer .. the right side, but unfortunately did not take account of the left, which completely ruined the final goal. i have add two notes: try to imagine the picture with just the right part: everything changes. --Pava (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- To me, it matters to show the vegetation growing on the banks, because flora of the rivers banks is often quite specific. So we can consider that on the contrary, it may add encyclopedic value. --Myrabella (talk) 07:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Pava here. I have a sense what a great image this could have been if the composition were a bit different. That said it is still nice. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 21:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural