Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chlosyne lacinia.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chlosyne lacinia.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2013 at 03:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A litle Chlosyne lacinia. All by -- The Photographer (talk) 03:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support --MehdiTalk 04:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JaviP96 12:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 13:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Arcalino (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support JKadavoor Jee 11:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and colors, mitigating the small resolution and less-than-perfect detail on the head. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Good picture, but I think the head definition is not realy good, antennae blur, plus background bokeh weithing on the center.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- With that lens and a butterfly so small, a photo like this is not impossible, however, has cost me at least 60 shots to select from the same butterfly. Maybe because it is not a macro lens or I am definitely a newbi. I lean more for the second option. Thanks :) --The Photographer (talk) 13:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not many butterfly and dragonfly photographers use macro lens due to their shallow DOF. In-fact a 300mm generic is their ideal choice as a compromise on DOF against details. Eric uses a Sigma 50-500 at its long end for his dragonflies. But there are exceptions like Dr. Saji who use a Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L Macro USM for his butterflies. He is very famous for his Life Cycle series. A 100mm or shorter is not very helpful IMHO; except for small Lycaenidae. Just some viewpoints; there are different ideas. JKadavoor Jee 04:52, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah well, I I meant that not everything is mm or apertures, lens quality greatly influences the outcome. I'm going out to take macro photos at this time. Thank you very much for the info, a hug! :) --The Photographer (talk) 15:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- With that lens and a butterfly so small, a photo like this is not impossible, however, has cost me at least 60 shots to select from the same butterfly. Maybe because it is not a macro lens or I am definitely a newbi. I lean more for the second option. Thanks :) --The Photographer (talk) 13:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods
