Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios a lo largo del río Nidelva, Trondheim, Noruega, 2019-09-06, DD 63.jpg

File:Edificios a lo largo del río Nidelva, Trondheim, Noruega, 2019-09-06, DD 63.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2019 at 17:26:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios a lo largo del río Nidelva, Trondheim, Noruega, 2019-09-06, DD 63.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edificios a lo largo del río Nidelva, Trondheim, Noruega, 2019-09-06, DD 63.jpg

390

1914

337

2020

7975

5317

cw tilt

7160

2765

691

425

7975

5317

CA

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Norway
•  Info View of Bakklandet neighborhood along the Nidelva river seen from Gamle Bybro bridge, Trondheim, Norway. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:26, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral good, but imho not outstanding. I would prefer better light and composition, something like this or this. --Ivar (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose good but nothing special, no wow --Kreuzschnabel 18:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Not that sharp for a panorama, nowadays, mediocre light and uninteresting clouds, and I really love the composition of the 2nd photo linked by Ivar. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of deep of field and boat is blurred. IMHO f/14 should be better and a shooter more fast (maybe using more ISO) to keep the boat on focus. --Wilfredor (talk) 00:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per the others. Nice picture and view, but not special enough for FP for me. --Domob (talk) 08:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel --Fischer.H (talk) 17:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The light is what's missing here. I've seen a couple of other attempts to get an FP out of this admittedly strong motif, but none have been fortunate enough to capture it under interesting light, and I'm afraid I think the same this time. Cmao20 (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others, chiefly because of the sky and the light. Daniel Case (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)