Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fennec Fox @ Africa Alive, Lowestoft 3.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Fennec Fox @ Africa Alive, Lowestoft 3.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2011 at 04:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Tim Parkinson on Flickr - uploaded by Vrlpep 12552 - nominated by IdLoveOne (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 04:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)- Weak support: Beautiful photograph, but it might benefit from a tighter crop. TFCforever (talk) 05:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Not featured-quality composition. Steven Walling 19:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)- Oppose Not featured picture quality, and needs a tighter crop. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Comment To above about crop: I'll see what I can do, but those shadows worry me when it comes to cropping as they might get in the way.. I don't really mind the composition as it, but we'll see.. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 10:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Neutral Composition is as I would expect (though the fox would be in a better position a little bit more to the left), and I find the shadow on the top left a little distracting.--Snaevar (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
-- IdLoveOne (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Alt[edit]
- Info Because of the stones and the shadows I thought this was the best way to go to get rid of them so there wouldn't be an annoying little cut off piece of stone or shadow here or there. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 21:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 21:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Still not high enough quality, and the oval crop looks very strange. Sorry, but this picture just won't cut the bananas on FPC, no matter what is done to it. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- IMO the image and lighting itself is pretty good and sharp. *I wonder if I should have used a transparent background instead of black... * I don't think the oval shape is any stranger than all the many FPs we have with total and obviously digitized white and black backgrounds, and I think this shape really does draw the eye to the fox. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Now you just need to convert to BW and add some scratches and will look really nostalgic :) --ELEKHHT 23:14, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Question Is this meant as a joke? W.S. 08:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Excuse me, newbie, constructive criticism only please. Nothing else is welcome on Commons. You can tilt your head upward slightly to read the practical reasons I made this choice in edit. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 08:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO the stones where not a problem to begin with, and I like the original better.--Snaevar (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment -- What about some pretty flowers decorating the frame? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not like the composition. The black background is disturbing--Miguel Bugallo 20:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Sad to see Commons being so closed-minded. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
