Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fishermen with his son on Pier Juan Griego.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2016 at 13:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info All by -- The Photographer 13:38, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment Aha! So this is something like what you were talking about. It looks lovely and very similar to some of the piers in our harbor on calmer evenings. 
Here we fish for mackerel I see that you have fixed most of the things pointed out in the first nomination. I can see that the "strange color" in the water probably is from a bit of petrol/oil spill (seen that often enough) but there is still some color noise on the pier and the mountains (see notes). Happy to support this if that is fixed. cart-Talk 14:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, let me know if noise is better now. BTW, yes this color is a effect of gasoil used by the boats. It's a personal moment yes and is what I was telling you --The Photographer 15:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Better now, thanks! --cart-Talk 16:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry. I think if the father's head was turned so we could also see his face in silhouette then it would work better. Eye-lines help with composition to add interest. Perhaps also if you were over to the left, so that the fishermen and sun and boat were closer together. I think, compared to your second upload, you've gone a bit too far with the processing. Restrain yourself with those sliders!!! I don't have a problem with processing an image as art rather than as "how it was" but it then has to be very well done. The image here just looks "crunchy" as a result. -- Colin (talk) 17:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your recommendation, however, the pier was considerably destroyed in this photo, I took this photo from a column since the pier has no floor in this moment and this picture was taken a year earlier and you can seen the deterioration --The Photographer 00:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- I think you should have mentioned this is a re-nomination (first nomination), after making processing changes. I know it was a while ago. -- Colin (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right and thanks for let me know I'll do that in the next re-nominations --The Photographer 15:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- I think you should have mentioned this is a re-nomination (first nomination), after making processing changes. I know it was a while ago. -- Colin (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your recommendation, however, the pier was considerably destroyed in this photo, I took this photo from a column since the pier has no floor in this moment and this picture was taken a year earlier and you can seen the deterioration --The Photographer 00:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel quite the same as with the first nomination --Kreuzschnabel 21:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support The things that bother the opposers just aren't bothering me. I like the composition, the light, and the moment that's captured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support since I faved it on Flickr the minute I saw it there. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose The water looks like rubber. The two guys aren't doing anything I find exciting or interesting. I don't see the wow of this. lNeverCry 07:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose There are three things that detract from this photo for me: There seems to be a weird halo around the people, especially the one on the right; something is eye-catching and strange with the highlights on the folds of both of their shirts that I can't unsee; and the background (water, ship and land) especially on the left hand side appear "mushy". Storkk (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Good eye. I see that halo now, too, plus a strange vertical line on the pants of the man on the right and the water above him. The Photographer, could you address these things? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is a fishing line --The Photographer 23:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- I couldn't tell because of where it was, but of course that makes perfect sense. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Question - But what about the halo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:30, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe some light effect, I don't know why --The Photographer 13:54, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- I couldn't tell because of where it was, but of course that makes perfect sense. :-) Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj (talk) 19:28, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --The Photographer 18:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 02:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Sun
