Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forabühl Hütte.JPG

File:Forabühl Hütte.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2011 at 14:59:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Forabühl Hütte.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forabühl Hütte.JPG

probably not too good, but not foggy ;)

•  Info created & uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral The image stood out to me as I was scrolling through, but I don't like the composition. The hut is too high—too vertically centered. I would support a more widescreen crop (just cropping from the bottom only). – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 03:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Support I tried cropping it in various ways out of curiosity and they all suck. Your image can't be tampered with I guess! And I keep looking at it (sort of reminds me of the huts up in the Alps). – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 07:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Neutral I keep looking at the picture but I have to agree with the below comments about it being too gray. I struggled with this image in the beginning and still do, unfortunately. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁galaxies 03:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Support -- Raghith 05:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Stryn (talk) 06:21, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Maredentro
  • Less than 50 edits in Commons account -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:54, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 16:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support danke an Tomer T für die Nominierung --Böhringer (talk) 19:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support, unsual -- ☭Acodered (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good picture in general, but nothing extra-ordinary IMO. The background is too grey/foggy for my taste. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Jebulon. Steven Walling 18:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Jebulon too. W.S. 06:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor quality (a lot of blurry parts) and light (building underexposed, snow in background blown out). Nice and interesting composition though --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Not_foggy version added Przykuta → [edit] 15:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

• contrast is better, but the cropping ruins the composition and the quality problems are still there. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose For me the foreground subject is too dark to be gripping. --99of9 (talk) 00:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:06, 24 June 2011 (UTC)