Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garranos fight.jpg

File:Garranos fight.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2022 at 10:34:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Garranos fight.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garranos fight.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
•  Info created and uploaded by Norbertoe - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing. Such a beautiful shot. Looks like it's from another world. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, it’s amazing. Pity it’s oversharpened as well. --Kreuzschnabel 12:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Great shot. Gyrostat (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Ermell (talk) 21:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Kreuzschnabel & Satdeep Gill -- Wolf im Wald 22:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support This wouldn't have been an easy take. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Compelling image and composition, and quality is good enough IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support But the image very sharpened, and why the horses fighting. Maanshen (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

  You are right... The image is oversharpened. I did't notice that at the time of editing...

  These are Iberian wild horses (known as Garranos), in this situation a solitary male is trying to steal the females from the other, so they fight and bite each other! :) Norbertoe (talk) 11:24, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Weak support  Support Amazing photo, it’s just a pity that the plants and rocks at the bottom are quite oversharpened. --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

  You are right... The image is oversharpened. I did't notice that at the time of editing... Norbertoe (talk) 11:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

  @Norbertoe It would be great if you could upload a new version with reduced sharpening. I love the shot, but those haloes keep me from supporting. El Grafo (talk) 14:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

  I don't know how the previews and smaller size images are generated but the full size image looks much better than this preview... Norbertoe (talk) 15:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

  Yes, the previews of JPG files get some additional sharpening that exaggerate existing over-sharpening. I was referring to the full-size image, though. The plants in the foreground also look a bit weird to me at 100%. On the other hand, less sharpening might make it look soft at screen size. Your call ... El Grafo (talk) 10:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  Is it possible to upload a new version and replace the actual file? how can I do that? :) Norbertoe (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  Yes it is, it's just a bit hidden: On the file description page, scroll down to the file history and click "Upload a new version of this file". Or just click here El Grafo (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  Thank you!!! I made some adjustments, less processing and of course less sharpening. Hope it looks better now!! Thanks!!! :) Norbertoe (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  Norbertoe, thank you very much for the new version! IHMO the photo looks much more natural now. I have changed my vote to full support. And thanks to El Grafo for explaining how to upload a new version! --Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

  ... and it doesn't even look any worse at screen size. Have my  Support! El Grafo (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

  Thank you both for you help and support!! :) Norbertoe (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 14:20, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per Kreuz. Support Better now. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

  @Daniel Case Uploaded new version with overshapening corrected! :) Norbertoe (talk) 10:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

•  Weak support considering the shortcomings mentioned above. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Agree, not the best processing but a great capture anyhow Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Unusual -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support I guess it would have been great with no postprocessing at all. -- Ivar (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

  I don't know if it is possible to upload a new version of the file... When editing i used an old screen and didn't notice the oversharpening... Now I see it is exaggerated and even worse on the previews... Norbertoe (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Micha (talk) 00:14, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Magnificent. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:56, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Was probably "weak support" before, but the new version is full support. Great shot. Daniel Case you may want to check it again -- the uploader has a second version. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  00:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)