Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorzow katedra.jpg

File:Gorzow katedra.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2022 at 09:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gorzow katedra.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorzow katedra.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
•  Info created by Lukaszmalkiewicz.pl - uploaded by Lukaszmalkiewicz.pl - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Maybe it is a combination of several time exposures (no metadata). However, imo, it has a powerful wow. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:40, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too queerly in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Certainly a matter of taste. I like the contrast of dynamics/movement (the trams in the foreground) with statics/persistence (the cathedral); this contrast is underlined by the contrasting colours. Photos of this kind are often mere snapshots (because some art photographers seem to think that having a good idea makes technical quality superfluous); but not this one, it is well-composed and the facade of the cathedral is sharp and crisp. Well done. --Aristeas (talk) 18:07, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I concur with Milseburg, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Might work if it were just the cathedral and the trams, there's some conceptual and aesthetic contrast there, but the overhead lines and the other details make it too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Lupe (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically interesting, but per Milseburg, does not work for me as FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas, this is creative and well composed, I enjoy it a lot. Cmao20 (talk) 11:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose With Daniel Case. --August Geyler (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)