Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LaDefense pl.jpg

File:LaDefense pl.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2011 at 06:42:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:LaDefense pl.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LaDefense pl.jpg

•  Info created by Matism - uploaded by Matism - nominated by Claus
•  Support -- Claus (talk) 06:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose A vertical resolution of 1500 pixels for a 180° panorama over a city is too low as you can't make out any practical details. As well as the river is cropped out due to the limited vertical field of view demands an oppose from my side. _→AzaToth 11:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm ok with the level of detail for a panorama, but I am not fully convinced of the bottom crop. I would have liked to see the continuity of the river. --ELEKHH^T 14:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support gute Arbeit --Böhringer (talk) 21:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I know it is a "panorama", but it does not show how it is. The curve of the Seine river is exactly the contrary in real.--Jebulon (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Maybe this needn't be this wide. Noticeable CA, some stitching errors right in the middle, and overall little wow (but I'm biased here since I've seen this hundreds times). - Benh (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Agree with Benh regarding the stitching errors and the noticeable CA. + some perspective distortions. --Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support— MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Bunnyfrosch (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)