Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lima Klostergang IMG 1567a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lima Klostergang IMG 1567a.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Aug 2015 at 07:50:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Cloister in the Monastery of San Francisco, Lima (Peru): created by CHK46 - uploaded by CHK46 - nominated by CHK46 -- CHK46 (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- CHK46 (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support I like this proportion. FP for me :) --Laitche (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 14:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support: I wish the child was a bit sharper and positioned in one of the other arcs for better illumination. Nevertheless, it makes some interesting stories pop up in my mind: a child sitting on the floor of some boring old cloister holding a toy airplane, staring somewhere (out of a window?) … --El Grafo (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The boy is unsharp. Chromatic noise in some parts. Nice perspective, but achievement not good enough for FP IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose per Jebulon. Great composition, I like it much better than that similar pic from Vietnam recently, but the technical failings are just too many to ignore. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
* Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Great composition. --Tremonist (talk) 12:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice composition, but the quality is just not at FP level. We have a similar nomination at FPC here and the quality difference is obvious Poco2 17:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition doesn't work for me. The boy is just lost in the corner, and yet he looks towards outside the frame which is frustrating as well as an compositional error for me. The perspective draws my eyes toward the left, in the opposite direction of the boy's. And I don't mention the technical issues... - Benh (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018. --Cart (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results: