User talk:Christof46

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Christof46!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Fischerboot vor Bodø.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fischerboot vor Bodø.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuh auf Allgäuer Weide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me – nice photo. -- Spurzem 21:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trollfjord in Molde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Schärengarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stockholm Schärengarten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockholm Schärengarten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micos IMG 2130a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd have liked a bit more DOF, but this works well enough as is. --Crisco 1492 00:44, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwiebeln auf Antigua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lima Klostergang IMG 1567a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lima Klostergang IMG 1567a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heringsdorf IMG 2919aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted cw, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 15:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)  Comment You are right, better now?--CHK46 08:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality --Cccefalon 19:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Oppenheim IMG 2904aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deauville IMG 3908aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horta mole IMG 3554aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 12:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvo IMG 3632aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Faial IMG 3614aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graffiti IMG 3718aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. It's leaning out on both sides. And the filename should contain the location. --XRay 18:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you for the advice-- Christof46 20:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 17:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jakobpilger IMG 3734aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Defender in Alderney IMG 3900acc .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:35, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Aubin IMG 3778aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo is sharp and have the right perspective but there are soma CA in the trees (upper right) and on top of the lamppost that needs to be removed. It also need much better, more narrow and precise categories. W.carter 20:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks for your comments. --Christof46 22:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 12:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landrover Defender Kap Verde IMG 4168a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sao Nicolau PAICV IMG 4149a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Christof46,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minden 02 IMG 2405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 07:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorboot im Schärengarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfa GTA.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Extremely tight crop ... but OK. --Peulle 19:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguazú-Wasserfälle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santo Antao Fischerboote IMG 4319a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiroler Zugspitzbahn IMG 4738a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 23:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Demoted FP

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lima Klostergang IMG 1567a.jpg. --Cart (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Car number plate.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Christof46,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spanisches Rind IMG 0459-a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:58, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Magnus Buchenberg IMG 1137aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruenten-IMG 1172a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:16, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sakristeitür-IMG 1198a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, but please add in the future a minimum set of categories, what I see here is a door --Poco a poco 11:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvo IMG 3634aa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pidder-Sylt-IMG 1917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Monument Dakar IMG 5008a.jpg

File:Monument Dakar IMG 5008a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aréat (talk) 19:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)