Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes-Benz S203 -04.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mercedes-Benz S203 -04.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2010 at 15:25:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by kallerna - uploaded by kallerna - nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 15:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Support —kallerna™ 15:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Not very interesting picture to me with no wow and the focus/sharpness is rather poor --Herby talk thyme 15:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Mulazimoglu (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Herby, plus unbalanced composition --Pjt56 (talk) 18:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose easy subject, unsharp and noisy Je-str (talk) 22:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow Schnobby (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - Unlike most people here, I do not think it is completely unappealing to the eye. That said, I do not feel it is up to FP standards. Tiptoety talk 06:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Comment How could I improve the composition? IMO the scene is attractive witch the continuing road and snowfall (and the survival of the car), but maybe you haven't ever driven a Mercedes. ;) Is the composition somehow better in our other land vehicle-FPs like these: Ford, trailer, train, Mercedes (!) or Audi? Do all car-FPs have to be panning shots? —kallerna™ 15:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)- Oppose - Composition - Darius Baužys → talk 06:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
