Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes SL 500 front.JPG

File:Mercedes SL 500 front.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2009 at 15:04:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes SL 500 front.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mercedes SL 500 front.JPG

•  Info created by S 400 HYBRID - uploaded by S 400 HYBRID - nominated by 320td -- 320td (talk) 15:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very good picture. -- 320td (talk) 15:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support gestochen scharf und wirklich realistisch. außerdem nicht verzerrt wie fast alle Auto-Bilder auf der wiki dazu gehören auch viele bilder von S40 Hybrid oder wie er auch heißt. -- Luft+ (talk) 17:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Belle. Mais pourquoi la voiture parque à l'arrière-plan? Au total cette image est excellente. -- Autofan45 (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Jag tycker tycker det ser lite artificiellt ut at censurera nummerplåten, och den avhuggna bilen i bakgrunden är störande. /Daniel78 (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow. That's my picture nominated here. Thanks a lot for it. Thinking that that is my best picture I hope that it will be a featured picture. -- S 400 HYBRID (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition: second car in the background distracts. --99of9 (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion the picture has a sense. In the background we can see the little brother of the SL the SLK. So, I mean this composition is organized very well. For me this picture is also a featured picture because there are not so many good pictures at wiki like this. --Lukas.zz (talk) 20:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment If the second car is also a subject (which sounds fair enough), then I would prefer it was not chopped at the top. --99of9 (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Weak support. Since so many languages have appeared here... Sama obecność automobilu w tle nie wydaje mi się wadą godną sprzeciwu, jednakowoż fakt, iż wzmiankowany automobil ma ścięty dach, jest z pewnością niejakim minusem rzeczonej fotografii. Wolf (talk) 22:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose this is a solid shot and might be a case for QI. But for FP the composition is too straight forward. And the SLK in the back is distracting. To combine those 2 cars is in general a good idea, but with the cut off roof of the SLK the composition seems random. --AngMoKio (talk) 07:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment hmm...it smells a bit strange here. Does anyone else smell it? --AngMoKio (talk) 08:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry, that was my dog. :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
    • :) ok..now i know one source of the strange smell. But it also smells of socket puppets here. Don't you think? --AngMoKio (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
      • I don't know anything bout that; but what I can tell you is that my little dog did the most unholy fart just as I was looking at this nomination. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 11:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
        • That must be a sign :) He is thinking the way i do. Some pro voters are suspicious. --AngMoKio (talk) 11:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Normal, good quality image with samo small composition problems. No reason for FP, IHMO. --Karel (talk) 10:50, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

 320td (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC) There is no chance any more for FP -- 320td (talk) 13:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Why is there no chance any more? There are 6 pros and 4 opposes... --AngMoKio (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Because in five days the picture has to have at least 2/3 pro's and that is not the case right now. --320td (talk) 14:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)