Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow Kadashevskaya Embankment 2009 pano.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Moscow Kadashevskaya Embankment 2009 pano.jpg, withdrawn[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2012 at 22:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info c/u/n by A.Savin 22:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Support - A.Savin 22:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Oppose sorry Savin, it looks to much (HDRish-)synthetic for me. Perhaps you can rework it to better naturaly colors. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment Let's suppose the author wants to show this specific HDR-extreme Look which is quite popular to illustrate an article etc. In that case this oppose vote could be a mistake. Just my 5 cents. Best regards • Richard • [®] • 11:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support - I'm not morally opposed to HDR particularly if it can reveal something and I think this picture does that. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- I'm also a HDR/tonemapping (exposure blending) fan, but here it is a bit too much for me. I also don't have a problem to change my vote if A.Savin can remake his image with a bit less saturation + HDRish view. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 15:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree to the alchemist. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I must agree there are issues with color management. Toning goes far too much in the reds to me. For the rest it is FP.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 07:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Alchemist-hp.--Claus (talk) 09:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I do not like the crop on the bottom part; the reflex of the central house is missed...--Llorenzi (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination - A.Savin 14:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
