Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Sea Nettle (Chrysaora melanaster).jpg

File:Northern Sea Nettle (Chrysaora melanaster).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2011 at 12:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Sea Nettle (Chrysaora melanaster).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Northern Sea Nettle (Chrysaora melanaster).jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- Jovian Eye _storm 12:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment This image was taken with standard saturation setting. Brightness has been increased. This jellyfish has tentacles that are several feet long hence capturing the full creature is quite difficult. --Jovian Eye _storm 12:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 12:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 13:34, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  11:48, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's the contrast of orange and blue what makes it so beautiful. Very nice colors. Paolo (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support Good shot, I'd fully support it if it weren't so small (I know 2.2 MP is above miminum requirements, but nonetheless ...) -- H005 06:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The animal is not seen in full. The colors of the animal are not met. The photographic quality is poor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment The colour of any object depends on the colour of light used. Photographic quality cannot be at its highest because of thick non-optical grade glass between the camera and the subject. --Jovian Eye _storm 10:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Could be better.--Citron (talk) 12:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose disturbing background which overlapped with the motive at some areas (it seems so), not really sharp for the image size, DOF is very short, I don't really like the crop at bottom (I know, very difficult in such a case)... Overall not featured to me, sorry. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Would have been much better hadn't it been for the second jellyfish in the background. Suraj T 08:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--H. Krisp (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per other opposers. W.S. 07:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose 2nd jellyfish spoils the composition for me. --99of9 (talk) 13:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Uploaded new version with background jellyfish removed. --Jovian Eye _storm 12:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks, that's better IMO, but it probably needs relisting to check that the existing supporters are still happy. (And now I'm also having second thoughts about the lighting/exposure.) --99of9 (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

• Your alternative version should be uploaded as new file (the changing is too enormous), and then you can nominate the new one as new candidate, if you want. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I will renominate the new version when this one times out. --Jovian Eye _storm 00:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
•  Support beautiful colors--FALCOM (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)