Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 04.jpg

File:Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2022 at 11:52:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 04.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paulushofdamm - Überfallwehr 04.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
•  Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Llez (talk) 11:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support This reminds me of classic photos from the 1930s and earlier. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support fascinating patterns --Kritzolina (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:51, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Fascinating and nice in its simplicity. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 20:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Weak support There seems to be a bit of CA on the water going down the dam, and the water at the right edge looks sort of weird in some places, so maybe the processing could have been better. But this is one of those cases where the image is strong enough to survive. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 00:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's good technically, but the crop is just way to tight. I had no idea what I was looking at until I looked at the title. If I can't even have a remote guess what it is at first glance, I don't believe it should be FP. Sea Cow (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --PierreSelim (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Sea Cow. -- Karelj (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose per Sea Cow although I like the texture and graphic elements inthis image. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Question To the opposing voters: Do you think closeups of parts of things can't be great photos? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 22:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Liquid