Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rainbow lorikeet.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Rainbow lorikeet.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2010 at 14:37:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Fir0002 - uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by kuvaly -- kuvaly|d|p| 14:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Support -- kuvaly|d|p| 14:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Oversaturated and
Oppose below size requirements. --Dschwen (talk) 21:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Benh is probably right. I guess the flat flash lighting generates this look. --Dschwen (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment - It's pretty, but the colors don't look natural. Are they? Jonathunder (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment No, Dschwen is right, the saturation has been pumped up here. The real bird is very pretty, but the colours are not this strong. --99of9 (talk) 22:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Comment here stands that the colours aren't oversaturated --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small, oversaturated. —kallerna™ 11:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support even I would support a higher resolution --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small. --Dori - Talk 22:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't believe it's oversaturated. But I hate predominant flat flash lighting... - Benh (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -oversaturated- LadyofHats (talk) 02:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
