Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skyline Frankfurt 2011-01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Skyline Frankfurt 2011-01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2011 at 23:25:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by der Wolf im Wald - - nominated by Jebulon
- Frankfurt am Main, evening.-- Jebulon (talk) 23:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support I find this picture wonderful -- Jebulon (talk) 23:25, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice all around. Steven Walling 06:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 15:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposure and lack of sharpness on the buildings, especially on the top of the building with the triangle logo and also on the top of the building with the S shaped logo next to it. I would expect similar amount of quality on the buildings as there is on the sidewalk paraell to the river and the bridge. And those lines in the sky, I doubt that they are natural.--Snaevar (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Info I changed nothing in sky or somewhere else. Its all natural. I have not actually modified colours or saturation. ;-) -- Wolf im Wald 17:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! --Murdockcrc (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, per Snaevar--shizhao (talk) 08:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry but I also find the buildings, which are the main subject here, somehow not so vivid and dynamic as they should be.--MrPanyGoff 09:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I love the reflections, but I agree that too many of the buildings are washed out, unsharp or partly overexposed. The contrails also detract from the image IMO (if that's what the diagonal lines in the sky are), but the buildings are my main concern. --Avenue (talk) 12:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Support --Janusz J. (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)- Edit by anonymous user -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support I do not understand the arguments that have been raised against it. -- H005 23:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted, overexposure, lack of sharpness. --Mylius (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Avala (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 20:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 01:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture