Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spider November 2010-6a.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Spider November 2010-6a.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2010 at 16:26:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info New version of this nomination. Though the crop is a bit too tight on top, I belive the poor thing still have pelnty of air to breathe... Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Not better than the old version. Mulazimoglu (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support--Jebulon (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Lighting still very harsh. Steven Walling 04:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I suppose the crop is better, but the lighting is still much too harsh, and the background is quite distracting and reflective, probably from the flash used. IMO, straight-on or built-in flash typically casts very harsh, flat lighting, unless it is used very well as fill flash, which isn't the case here. Sorry. LeavXC (talk) 04:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Kooritza (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Steven Walling; sorry. --Citron (talk) 10:00, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support I voted for the older version and will do for this one as well. This image has great value as an illustration. This should be weighted in tandem with mere photographic technicalities. --Murdockcrc (talk) 10:23, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- TFCforever (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice and sharp, valuable, and now the composition is sufficient. --99of9 (talk) 11:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support Us 99of9 --Miguel Bugallo 00:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Локомотив 02:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The other FP of the same species has a much better quality, angle of view and composition.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)