Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hite Crossing Bridge HWY95 view2 MC.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Hite Crossing Bridge HWY95 view2 MC.jpg - featured[edit]
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Chmehl 19:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Support The second panorama has a view from beneath the bridge showing the Colorado River. -- Chmehl 19:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)- Support I prefer this one. Impressive composition but also a great stitching job. --AngMoKio 19:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Agree with AngMoKio --Simonizer 20:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Richard Bartz 00:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Very high quality shot, nice framing, the perspective is just great. Cirt 01:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Thermos 04:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one too. Very good. --MichaelMaggs 06:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis 06:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support top --Böhringer 09:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support This is good stuff. It would be valuable if you could document in the image page the tools and process you have used to generate this image. -- Slaunger 21:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good. --Karelj 22:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo. Too bad thumbnail is so poor. --Leafnode 05:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support This one is very nice... --Dsmurat 15:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- Myminpins 23:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Taraxacum 13:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. /Daniel78 22:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support Excellent pano. --Freedom to share 06:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Very good image. --Johney (T∀LK) 17:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support That is a fine example of a excellent panorama. Fred waldron 18:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Question That one doesn't look natural to me (still very good and impressive though). It's of course hard to be sure, since I've never been there. was the tripod's rotation axis set vertical, or do you fix this during sitching ? Benh 19:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- I used the Nodal Ninja [1] nodal point adapter which has a spirit-level (or water-level, what is it called in English?) built-in. So, the rotation is exactly around the vertical axis. I think the "bending" of the bridge is due to the cylindrical projection on the image plane. (I tried a rectangular projection also but for this large field of view you don't get usable results.) Chmehl 19:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- thanks for explaining :) Benh 18:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I used the Nodal Ninja [1] nodal point adapter which has a spirit-level (or water-level, what is it called in English?) built-in. So, the rotation is exactly around the vertical axis. I think the "bending" of the bridge is due to the cylindrical projection on the image plane. (I tried a rectangular projection also but for this large field of view you don't get usable results.) Chmehl 19:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support FRZ 02:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
20 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
