Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 21 2015

• 
  • Nomination Hue, Vietnam: Gate within the Imperial palace complex of Hue --Cccefalon 00:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kunming, Yunnan, China: Yunnan Provincial Museum. At the left side the National Defense Mansion. --Cccefalon 00:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Halavar 01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hue, Vietnam: Decorated gate of the Imperial palace in Hue --Cccefalon 00:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Some white area in the corner. See the note. --Halavar 01:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you, this slipped through my attention. However, I haven't my RAW with me, so  I withdraw my nomination and renominate when back home. --Cccefalon 02:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hispano-arab azulejos, National Palace of Sintra, Portugal. Alvesgaspar 00:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 00:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door of St. Agostin in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, but the image is not sharp enough, and have some blurred parts. --Halavar 21:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
    No problem --Livioandronico2013 21:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose window of St. Agostin in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 21:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Altar of St. Francis in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 20:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cloister of St. Francis in Amelia --Livioandronico2013 20:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 20:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Top Snail, Phorcus edulis --Llez 19:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silfra canyon, Þingvellir National Park, Suðurland, Iceland --Poco a poco 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment According to the right side of the image (see the note), I think image need some perspective correction. --Halavar 19:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done, thanks, Poco a poco 21:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Good now. --Halavar 21:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of D. Joao I, Figueira Square, Lisbon, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Bogumil, Gniezno Cathedral, Poland --Poco a poco 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 19:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Helsinki Central railway station, Finnland --Poco a poco 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of John of Nepomuk, Landshut, Germany --Poco a poco 18:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shore on Lake Woerth, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 18:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coats of arms for Grotta von Grottenegg at the epitaph, Maria Gail, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 18:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle ruins Altfinkenstein, Finkenstein, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 18:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pier at Werzer Esplanade, Poertschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 18:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Damaged mushroom. Location, garden sanctuary Jonker Valley. Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes, synonym: Macrolepiota rhacodes).
    Famberhorst 16:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fortress of Kayseri, Turkey --Bgag 15:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, well composed. --DXR 16:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Adiyaman, Turkey --Bgag 15:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A morning view of Lake Geneva from Place d'Armes in Cully, Switzerland. --Zcebeci 15:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scott Thwaites at the 2014 Tour of Britain stage 8a --KTC 13:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC) *  Comment I´m just waiting for someone, who will say: "The eyes are not sharp!" ;-) --Hubertl 15:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bus in Toulon --Billy69150 12:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 15:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of Madonna in Laghel Arco --Moroder 12:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The tenth station of the Way of the Cross in Laghel Arco - Jesus is stripped of His garments. --Moroder 12:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose disturbing overexposed sky --Christian Ferrer 00:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The neinth station of the Way of the Cross in Laghel Arco - Jesus falls the third time. --Moroder 12:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The nineth station of the Way of the Cross in Laghel Arco - Jesus falls the third time. --Moroder 12:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of Ngakuts Bay, Marlborough Sounds, South Island of New Zealand --DXR 12:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bgag 15:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A view of timber-framed buildings in Frankfurt-Höchst as seen from the Höchster Schloss. The moat of the castle is visible in the foreground. --DXR 12:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Trier, church of our lady, portal --Berthold Werner 10:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Shadow at the bottom a little bit disturbing, but IMO still QI. --XRay 10:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gymnaste Youna Dufournet of France in 2010 (Sorry for this 6th nomination yesterday ; I hadn't come here for a long time and I had not seen this recent rule). --~~~~ (nomination by TwoWings --XRay 10:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC))
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa 5 --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Étang d'Ingril. Frontignan, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 08:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acton Town tube station. Mattbuck 07:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 456016 at Tulse Hill. Mattbuck 07:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Preston Tower, near Chathill. Mattbuck 07:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. There are some minor problems at the top edge of the tower, but QI for me --Hubertl 08:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evesham railway station. Mattbuck 07:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coesfeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 00:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Euphorbia amygdaloides var. robbiae. the flower buds are already visible in February.
    Famberhorst 05:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 09:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination l'A Bran, (1798 m) Val d'Anniviers. European larch (Larix decidua).
    Famberhorst 05:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aula of the Academy of Sciences - Details of the stairway --Hubertl 03:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion A few dark but Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aula of the Academy of Sciences - Details of the columns, capitels and ceiling --Hubertl 03:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall - Bust in the Austrian Academy of Science, Vienna. First president of the Academy (1847-1849) Bust from the second quarter of the 19. century --Hubertl 03:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hopper Car No. 1818 --Ram-Man 02:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Maya Lord of Death, stone sculpture.--Jebulon 23:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion You already cropped background from the skull. Is there a special reason to leave the hard shadow? IMO it would be a good idea to get rid of it. --Cccefalon 00:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC) Of course you understand the shadow is on purpose, and is convenient with the real museum lighting. I let it for a use with another background. It gives more informations. Let's continue this discussion.--Jebulon 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
    Good quality. As the shadow part is comparatively small, it might work with darker backgrounds and is ok for me. --Cccefalon 01:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Picture in the abandoned theme-park Dadipark --Abigor 20:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Camera severely tilted with no apparent reason. If that's supposed to be an artistic effect, it doesn't work for me. Sorry, --El Grafo 11:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door knocker in the medieval town of Pérouges, France. --TwoWings 20:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion I wish it was a bit more symmetrical, but that may well be the door's fault. Otherwise QI for me. --El Grafo 12:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC) - I'm so stupide, I forgot this one was already QI ! Well it's even more deserved, I suppose ! --~~~~
• 
  • Nomination Young gorilla in the zoo of Saint-Martin-la-Plaine, France (photo taken through glass). --TwoWings 20:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Color balance seems off to me, sharpness not quite sufficient. --El Grafo 12:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train station, Embid de la Rivera, Spain --Poco a poco 19:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Lots of CA, almost everywhere. I think that it might be fixable, so I didn't oppose. --Halavar 23:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
     Done Poco a poco 21:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
     Support Much better now. QI for me. --Halavar 00:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Belgenmonument in Ede, a memorial to people from World War 1 that came to Ede, Holland --Abigor 08:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion The bottom needs a crop to get rid of the out of focus area --Cccefalon 17:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    Better now. Please leave notifications about new versions here at the review, so that all reviewers have a chance to look at it. --Cccefalon 01:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination light-effects of a window --Abigor 07:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. You didn't clean the stairs before taking the picture ;-) --Moroder 12:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleiner Blaupfeil - Orthetrum coerulescens, Männchen (male) --Hockei 20:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kleiner Blaupfeil - Orthetrum coerulescens, Männchen (male) --Hockei 20:32, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock formations near Exomytis, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancient Rock cut tomb near Exomytis, Santorini, Greece. --NorbertNagel 19:25, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Student of Yogyakarta State University during a Chinese-Indonesian fusion fashion show, Sudirman Street, Yogyakarta.Crisco 1492 15:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok but is it possible to have a category for the place where the image is taken (for this image and for the others in this series too)? --Christian Ferrer 19:42, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
    Do you mean geotag? Done.Crisco 1492 23:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
    I added two categories; probably Christian was thinking of more specific categories. --Cccefalon 15:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    Could have sworn I read "Location". Done on all five images in the series now. Thanks.Crisco 1492 23:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)  Support thanks you both --Christian Ferrer 07:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Lagoa da Conceicao, Florianopolis, Brazil --Ezarate 01:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)*  Comment tilted ccw. Please check.--Hubertl 18:35, 16 February 2015 (UTC)  Done thanks!!!Ezarate 19:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)*  Not done still tilted. --Hubertl 21:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC) see now, please Ezarate 21:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)*  Support Good quality now. --Hubertl 08:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Khustain Nuruu National Park, Réserve de Hustai , en Mongolie.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:51, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. I like this very much! --Moroder 12:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Trier, Neustraße 42 --Berthold Werner 18:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient quality. Sorry, but the sunlight only on top and the car up front doesn't make this a good composition --Moroder 12:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Village of Mustafapaşa, Nevşehir Province, Turkey --Bgag 16:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 12:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tap and circuit breaker on a 20 kV line in North Yorkshire --Kreuzschnabel 08:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline The mast is tilted Poco a poco 12:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
     Comment The picture has been taken from below the mast at a very steep angle in order to have an even gray background (instead of the hillside). I don’t find the tilt confusing here. --Kreuzschnabel 13:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Oppose Sorry, I have to agree with Poco a poco. That just looks wrong to me. --El Grafo 16:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
    Sorry for the late answer Kreuzschnabel, looks wrong to me also, but fixable with a tilt Poco a poco 21:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Klagenfurt Lendkanal Rizzibruecke 07102008 04.jpg

• Nomination Rizzi bridge across the Lendkanal, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 09:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support QI for me --Halavar 14:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurry and noisy --Christian Ferrer 15:09, 15 February 2015
•  Support. Very good for the main subject is sharp and the colors are beautiful. -- Spurzem 13:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC) (UTC)
•  Support. Very good --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oh my! Severe JPEG artifacts visible around the iron structure (see annotation). Colours oversaturated, image generally noisy. Main subject looks oversharpened (white seams around dark parts). Not a QI for me. And again: That does not mean the image isn’t "nice". It is nice but still shows poor quality. That’s what QI is about, it’s not "nice images" after all. --Kreuzschnabel 07:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. Also, I think that the framing could have been greatly improved by moving a few steps to the right, centering the channel and having the sensor parallel to the guard railing (instead of almost parallel). --El Grafo 09:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
• Thanks for all the pros and contras, I decided to withdraw that image. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Villacher Strasse 93 Baeume am Lendkanal 07102008 1003.jpg

• Nomination Autumnal villa on Villacher Strasse #93, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 09:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good quality. --Hubertl 11:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose blown sky --Christian Ferrer 15:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Not blown (are you giving random judgments?). Every pixel is within the spectrum. Nice picture --Moroder 10:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry guys, but quality is really on the poor side. Not only the red and blue channels are overexposed (this is a fact, not an opinion) but the detail is much affected by noise. Alvesgaspar 10:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as Moroder -- Spurzem 14:02, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  SupportGood quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Overexposed sky, general low quality (blur on left, lack of fine sharpness elsewhere). Mattbuck 21:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. Nice scene yet poor technical quality (and that’s what QI is about). The poplar tree lost all its detail due to background overexposure and shows sharpening artifacts, so does the house to the left. Sky partly blown. --Kreuzschnabel 06:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others: low on detail. --El Grafo 18:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
• Thanks for all the pros and contras, I decided to withdraw that image. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse 96 herbstliche Villa 07102008 1182.jpg

• Nomination Autumnal villa on Tarviser Strasse #96, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Maybe some saturated, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Massive oversaturation. See Histogram, esp. red and blue channel. --Smial 05:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 08:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good now, thx. -- Smial 14:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Obvious oversaturation in the red and green channels (please see the histogram). Alvesgaspar 10:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 00:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Severe JPEG artifacts, see annotation (elswhere too, as around the chimney). --Kreuzschnabel 09:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 08:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for all the pros and contras, I decided to withdraw that image. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse 96 herbstliche Villa 07102008 1188.jpg

• Nomination Autumnal villa on Tarviser Strasse #96, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support A photo like painted. Very good. I like it. --Steindy 00:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Massive oversaturation. See Histogram, esp. red and blue channel. --Smial 05:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 09:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good now, thx. -- Smial 14:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry guys, but please look more carefully. Can you see any detail in the red leaves? I can't! Alvesgaspar 10:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose lack of details --Christian Ferrer 13:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 00:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose JPEG artifacts still visible but not as strong as in the other nominations of this subject, but here the red foliage on the house (see annotation) suffers from loss of detail (per Alvesgaspar). There is nothing but an anonymous mass of red, hardly any single leaves visible. I suppose the oversaturation caused a loss of information here that cannot be regained without the raw file. --Kreuzschnabel 09:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see any „minor flaw“ (© Alvesgaspar). I see only a photo in good quality. QI is really a funny game... --Steindy 22:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment QIC is not a game at all, it is a forum where the quality of photos is assessed on the basis of technical criteria. For doing it properly one needs to have some knowledge, to support the reviews with sound technical arguments and to be intelectually honest. Apparently that is not your approach, as you go on voting in favour of poor quality nominations whith no valid justification either than an apparent regional cruzade. That is detrimental to QIC and to the project, and bad for your reputation. Alvesgaspar (talk)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 08:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for all the pros and contras, I decided to withdraw that image. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Klagenfurt Tarviser Strasse 96 herbstliche Villa 07102008 1189.jpg

• Nomination Autumnal villa on Tarviser Strasse #96, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 17:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support A photo like painted. Very good. I like it. --Steindy 00:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  

Massive oversaturation. See Histogram, esp. red and blue channel. Loss of Detail in all red areas. --Smial 05:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)  Done Reworked version uploaded. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

• Weak  Support Still a bit blurry in red areas, but this is a common problem with many digital cameras. Much better, more natural colors now, so changed vote. -- Smial 14:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Red leaves completely blurred, too tight framing of subject. Alvesgaspar 10:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose blurred --Christian Ferrer 13:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 00:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Severe JPEG artifacts, see annotations. I don’t have to scroll down. Images showing poor JPEG compression can never be QI for me, however nice they may be. --Kreuzschnabel 07:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Hubertl 08:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks for all the pros and contras, I decided to withdraw that image. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Seahouses MMB 05 Bamburgh Castle Inn.jpg

• Nomination The Bamburgh Castle Inn. Mattbuck 10:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
• Promotion  Comment Is it not slightly tilted?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
  The verticals appear to be vertical. Mattbuck 17:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
   Comment Using the window frames as a reference is usually a good idea and as far as I cross checked, they are rectilinear. --Cccefalon 14:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
   SupportGood quality. Promoted after the original reviewer didn't came back for one week. --Cccefalon 08:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC) * Oppose Please, see my note the roof is not horizontal --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  Yes, that is due to perspective. Just as pointing up or down generates perspective like \/ or /\, if you are not looking straight at something you generate perspectives like < or >. That does not mean the photo is tilted however, as tilt refers to the camera not being horizontal. Mattbuck 17:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC) * thank you Mattbuck for your reply --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  Hei Pierre, a total front view with parallel horizontal lines is not mandatory for QI. QI asks for rectilinear verticals. --Cccefalon 23:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral thank you Cccefalon for this info I did not know--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:02, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Welcome, Pierre. There is one addendum: Sometimes, when a buildings image is taken as exact front shot and the building is symetrical, it is correct to ask for parallel lines but in my personal opinion, this should not end up in pixel peeping because buildings and lenses are not always perfect :) --Cccefalon 09:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
    •  Thank you. Cccefalon I take note of this information --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 08:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Kilburn High Road railway station MMB 01.jpg

• Nomination Kilburn High Road railway station. Mattbuck 21:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Somewhat hazy. --Palauenc05 08:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Apparently there is some motion blur, but I cannot see haze (nor I can see something mentioned in image guidelines conserning haze). --C messier 15:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Palauenc05 I have no idea what you're referring to. It was a miserable day, so a bit of drizzle in the air I suppose. But it's far from hazy and is in no way opposeworthy. Mattbuck 23:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient DoF and/or unfavourably focused IMHO (even the flagpoles behind the hooded display are blurry while I’d expect at least the bridge to be still sharp), and yet the image looks oversharpened (for example, the tracks behind the platform end, or the letters on the display screens) --Kreuzschnabel 07:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Insufficient DoF --Livioandronico2013 20:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Insufficient DoF --Christian Ferrer 20:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low DOF, only sharp in the foreground. --Steindy 23:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:20140830_Wuppertal_Feuertal_0436_Korpiklaani.jpg

• Nomination Korpiklaani at Feuertal 2014, Wuppertal. By User:MarkusFelix --Achim Raschka 14:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Some motion blur, but acceptable regarding the high resolution and the lighting situation. --Smial 22:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose The face is totally unsharp and this is not the motion blur. --Steindy 01:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry. Face is unsharp.--XRay 13:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Amiens, les hortillonnages, (13).jpg

• Nomination Les Hortillonnages d'Amiens commune d' Amiens.- Somme (département), France--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)*  Comment some small overexposed areas, see notes. Apart from that, it would be QI for me if you fix it! --Hubertl 23:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
   Done I've corrected overexposed areas in the background. Thanks for your review.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality - now! --Hubertl 12:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Mostly out of focus/blurry; posterisation and artifaction centre-screen. --Mattbuck 21:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I would like a bit more red then green but QI. -- Spurzem 08:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)  Thank you. I would apply this on a similar next picture--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Shadows too dark, CAs, main part out of focus.--XRay 11:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree XRay -- DerFussi 09:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose i agree to Mattbuck and XRay --Berthold Werner 09:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined  

File:Maastricht, scultptuur Stationsstraat-Wilhelminasingel foto8 2014-10-19 17.45.jpg

• Nomination Maastricht, sculpture --Michielverbeek 21:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment great picture, it would be even better (and QI for me), if you lighten up the dark areas. I tried it, and it works fine. --Hubertl 23:17

•  Done Is it better like this? --Michielverbeek 08:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC), 7 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Yes. Its ok now! --Hubertl 09:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  

•  Oppose Perspectives need correcting before QI. --Mattbuck 21:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMHO its too dark. --Berthold Werner 06:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   Berthold Werner 06:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)