Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 04 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Bergues.-_porte_aux_boules_rn_2020_(3).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Bergues - Porte aux Boules - avenue Vauban (France).--Pierre André Leclercq 16:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Level of detail is too low. --Augustgeyler 11:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Please How do you determine that the level of detail is too low?.--Pierre André Leclercq 11:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
  • I compare the level of detail we can expect from a digital image shot in 2020 with the one you nominated. --Augustgeyler (talk) 11:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I think there's enough detail. -- Ikan Kekek 07:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support --Palauenc05 09:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't understand why this image does not compare in quality with "a digital image shot in 2020" --Moroder 10:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 12:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Somewhat soft in 100% view, but good enough. It has full 16 Mpixel resolution and can be printed to A3 size or even larger without problem. --Smial 00:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment A perpective correction would be though good Poco a poco 17:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done Perpective correction.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Mdaniels5757 19:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)