Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 06 2019

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Double_hashing.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Double hashing. --KCVelaga 08:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too simple for QI IMHO --Poco a poco 17:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per poco -- Eatcha 18:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Why is this image in the CR section actually? I'd expect an argument why this image shall be QI Poco a poco 09:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
  • It's probably that vandalism thing; some user was using multiple accounts and some images may have ended up in the wrong place during the cleanup.--Peulle 11:19, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   No support.--Peulle 18:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Human_outline_generic.svg[edit]

  • Nomination Human outline generic. --KCVelaga 08:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too simple for QI --Eatcha 10:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not enough creative input to be anywhere near a QI as far as I'm concerned. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:51, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per above Poco a poco 09:05, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   No support.--Peulle 18:41, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Fiat_Sachs_Franken_Classic_2018_P5201269.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fiat 124 Sport Spider at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally --Ermell 06:12, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. How many of these do you have? I'm amazed by the number of models of cars you got photos of. -- Ikan Kekek 06:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Prinses_Margriettunnel_(Aquaduct)_(d.j.b.)_09.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Prinses Margriettunnel Nature around the Princess Margriet tunnel and the Princess Margriet canal.
    --Famberhorst 05:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but I would cut off the street at the right --Llez 05:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
    Answer: I considered that. But it's nature next to the traffic tunnel. You see the cars dive into the tunnel.--Famberhorst 05:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
     Support - Really solid quality, and why is this in CR? It looks like there was only a supporting vote above. -- Ikan Kekek 07:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
    •  Info  Support Yes, it was a positive vote by me. I changed it to "promoted", the crop was only a proposal, not an opponing! --Llez 11:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 18:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:USCG_Signalman_Third_Class_insignia.svg[edit]

  • Nomination USCG Signalman Third Class insignia. --KCVelaga 05:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Promotion

 Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 13:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support - On what basis do you disagree? It looks fine to me at 2000px. -- Ikan Kekek 07:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 Support - Who disagreed ? I see no oppose/comment here. -- Eatcha 18:07, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   No opposition.--Peulle 22:14, 5 May 2019 (UTC))

File:WMPL_Conference_Bydgoszcz_2017_by_Maire_092.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Konferencja Wikimedia Polska 2017 w Bydgoszczy. By User:Maire --Made by people like you, yes really you 05:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 06:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think we need to discuss this one further; two people have their faces obscured. That means it's not a "Quality Image", doesn't it?--Peulle 07:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I agree. No quality image. -- Ikan Kekek 06:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose no quality picture.--Fischer.H 16:56, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I do not understand that such a failed group picture was presented here as a quality image. -- Spurzem 20:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:After_Wikimania_2018,_Berlin_(P1060110).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Return from Wikimania 2018. By User:MB-one --Alohacrone det 04:11, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 06:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but I think the DoF is too shallow; the man on the right is out of focus.--Peulle 07:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle. It is a bit jarring to have that one man out of focus. -- Ikan Kekek 06:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle.--Fischer.H 17:03, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The face of the man on the right in the picture is out of focus. Perhaps the photo is a nice picture for the family album but not a quality image. -- Spurzem 20:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:2019-04-25_(175)_Natrix_natrix_(grass_snake)_with_length_about_one_meter_at_Haltgraben,_Frankenfels,_Austria.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Natrix natrix (grass snake) with length about one meter at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.--GT1976 21:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The head is not sharp --Cvmontuy 21:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Only sharp at the end.--Ermell 17:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose not very sharp.--Fischer.H 17:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Bussaia_Servatun.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mount Bussaia and Mount Servatun --Andrea Einaudi 18:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Great scene. But it the vignetting looks a bit too strong for me and I want to ask why the resolution is only 25% of the camera´s possibilities. --Milseburg 16:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Downsized without reason.--Peulle 10:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I would accept downsizing to 6 MPix, which is "good enough", if the image were crisp then. Unfortunately despite downsizing it is still not really sharp. --Smial 08:46, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  • @Smial You do realize that this is exactly what those guidelines were written to prevent, right? The "oh, my image isn't sharp enough, so I'll downsize it so that looks sharper" tactic? I think all such images should dismissed out of hand.--Peulle 10:28, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 Info @Peulle: I started a discussion on our talk page to this point and the free interpretations of the downsampling rule. --Milseburg 12:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:38, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Panwali_Dwar_and_Nanda_Khat.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Panwali Dwar and Nanda KhatI. By User:Goutam1962 --Yann 14:43, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 14:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Itßs too dark. --Milseburg 17:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Milseburg. In particular, it seems clear that that sky is not believable. -- Ikan Kekek 05:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Also dustspots.--Peulle 10:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too dark, why aperture 22? also still slight CA.--Fischer.H 17:14, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia_and_Education_User_Group_Logo_(without_text).svg[edit]

  • Nomination Wikipedia and Education User Group logo. --KCVelaga 05:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 09:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think it's too simple. The globe is the only complex shape, and that's been copied in.--Peulle 12:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 16:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Puelle. Tournasol7 06:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. --Cvmontuy 14:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good logo. I'd allow it. -- Ikan Kekek 06:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle. --Smial 08:36, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle --Milseburg 16:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 18:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)