Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 07 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:DKW RT 350 S, Bj. 1956 (rechts).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination DKW RT 350 S from 1956 at museum mobile -- Spurzem 18:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Numerous areas of CA, please fix. Mattbuck 18:42, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
    In my opinion it is good now. But probably you are not satisfied. -- Spurzem 14:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
    Slight CAs were the only lack of this photo. They are removed since six days. Therefore I ask for objective and unbiased discussion now. -- Spurzem 22:37, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 Comment I'm afraid the CA on the wheel is still here, (and the cropped vehicle behind is disturbing, IMO. Maybe a masking job could help ?). It is an interesting image, however.--Jebulon 10:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

 Comment I know many other QIs of vehicles with more disturbing backgrounds, foregrounds and other disturbing details. But they are not from Spurzem! Do you understand what I will say? -- Spurzem 21:38, 2 November 2013
The slight CA at the wheel of side-car is removed. What other lacks do you find now? -- Spurzem 23:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)(UTC)

 Support The main subject is very good, I think it can pass.--Jebulon 09:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jebulon 09:25, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sèvres_-_Plâtre_-_Agathon_Léonard,_danseuse_n°15,_modèle_plâtre_001.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plaster model for the Dance sculpture #15 by Agathon Léonard. --Coyau 17:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  OpposeInsufficient quality. Noisy. --Moroder 23:26, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Not so bad, IMO. I need a third opinion.--Jebulon 14:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Moroder--Lmbuga 21:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
     Comment Removed some noise (as an option). --Aleks G 00:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Aleks G: Why did you alter the white balance? Perhaps the lighting is in fact somewhat blue? -- Smial 12:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok, though I believe the original version is better. -- Smial 12:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Mattbuck 19:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose noisy, lack of contrast, not QI --P e z i 19:57, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me. Pleclown 17:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Given the large size, the noise level is acceptable, QI for me. But as Smial, I prefer the original version. --Selbymay 13:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Selbymay 13:00, 6 November 2013 (UTC)