I changed it to a comment. However if you think that the improper white balance results in the image failing to fulfill criterion 3 "Most illustrate its subject well", which implies it should have "Reasonable sharpness, lighting, composition, and angle of view" then you are of course entitled to oppose. That depends on what you find is "reasonable". It passes my "reasonable" bar, but that does not mean it passes yours... -- Slaunger (talk) 20:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info I have uploaded newer version of the image which I think is properly (or at least better) balanced on the white. Square (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
