Commons:Valued image candidates/Tangrams

Tangrams

declined

Images
Description	SVG Tangram image set.
Nominated by	Nevit Dilmen (talk) on 2010-08-26 21:00 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope: Tangrams
Review (criteria)	As a joke: to lead up idea to the point of irrationality it is a good example. However game has infinite set of other variants. Why letters have terminated in a symbol "F" instead of "Z"? Still it is necessary to display the Greek symbols, the Arabian writing and some hieroglyphs. As transport it is necessary to add aircraft. I have easily made some planes, however they aren't present in a set. Among animals there are no reptiles. And so on... And now serious. Summing up: try to make compound pictures of several simple on the general themes. For an example: 1. Letters 2. People 3. Candles 4. Cats 5. Ships 6. geometrical figures. It will be enough, I will be ready to support the laconic set representing advantage. But for this set of 252 images i give my very strong  Oppose --George Chernilevsky talk 08:19, 27 August 2010 (UTC)  Comment I'm afraid you are trying to change the scope. I believe in the category Tangrams, this is the most valuable set. 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4.Completeness of the set is not a criteria. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 09:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC) Oh, You give me vrong. I didn't write about change the scope. Please make the incorporated image, instead of the scope. One image = set of people figures, next one image = set of letters... I think any article in Wikipedia won't use such large set. Hence, it doesn't give advantage. In my opinion it is very random and too wide set. And read please en:No original research. With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 10:45, 27 August 2010 (UTC)  Strong oppose - way too many images. I believe we can represent tangrams with a single image, showing all of the standard pieces, not even a set. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination since the current reviews are not based on criteria alone. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 22:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator => closed with status=declined according to Commons:Valued image closure#Closing valued image set candidates. --Myrabella (talk) 12:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)