File talk:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg
Taşlı Köprü ?[edit]
In Turkey, Taş Köprü or Taşköprü (not Taşlı Köprü) are used for many bridges and places as proper noun. One of the most notable taş köprü s is Taşköprü in Adana. Taşlı Köprü also means bridge made of stone and it seems common noun. As to this bridge, maybe some local people call Taşlı Köprü, but I couldn't find any reliable sources for Taşlı Köprü. I found a source for Taş Köprüsü (TAŞ KÖPRÜSÜ Zamanında Sitnitsa deresi üstüne yapılan bu köprü, ancak sonraları bu dere yatağını değiştirerek, Raif Vırmiça, Kosova'da Osmanlı mimari eserleri, Kültür Bakanlığı, 1999, p. 283.). But Taş Köprüsü seems to be a common noun. Takabeg (talk) 03:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- At the same time, I couldn't find the name "Vojinovića Bridge" in reliable sources (see: "Vojinovića Bridge" in google.books = 0 hit). Takabeg (talk) 03:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vojinović Bridge is the noun, Vojinovića Bridge is current version of name on several Wikipedias. There are sources for that... I just wanted to react, as it is obviously not specific, so common wiki name was used for that... --WhiteWriter speaks 10:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- "Vojinović Bridge" is possible. Takabeg (talk) 12:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- OK, therefor, i will propose "Vojinović Bridge, Vučitrn, September 2010". Is that ok? Just waiting for Geagea. --WhiteWriter speaks 16:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- "Vojinović Bridge" is possible. Takabeg (talk) 12:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Vojinović Bridge is the noun, Vojinovića Bridge is current version of name on several Wikipedias. There are sources for that... I just wanted to react, as it is obviously not specific, so common wiki name was used for that... --WhiteWriter speaks 10:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- I just observed what will going on, so I was silent. Result is same, fair. This is my file dear users and we had had discussion about this file's name on March 2012. Also we solved it. Discussion was closed. Nowadays I saw again a new attempt and I just want to say enough. There is a bridge, I photographed it and uploaded it. One of its name is Taşlı Köprü (also as in wiki Taşlı Köprü), I chose it. Geagea solved new meaningless attempt. Thanks to him. Photo Balkan (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- See this comment. Takabeg (talk) 11:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- This is OBVIOUSLY not the name in any language, and therefor should be renamed as in my proposition. --WhiteWriter speaks 13:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- See this comment. Takabeg (talk) 11:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- I just observed what will going on, so I was silent. Result is same, fair. This is my file dear users and we had had discussion about this file's name on March 2012. Also we solved it. Discussion was closed. Nowadays I saw again a new attempt and I just want to say enough. There is a bridge, I photographed it and uploaded it. One of its name is Taşlı Köprü (also as in wiki Taşlı Köprü), I chose it. Geagea solved new meaningless attempt. Thanks to him. Photo Balkan (talk) 12:30, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Takabeg, I think you wrote for me. On Turkish Wiki, as you might know, has got article and resources. WhiteWriter, resolution is simple. Tell someone for new photograph or you do it, take one photo from this bridge and make new file for Commons. So then you can choose one name variant for your own image. I don't want to continue talking about this repetitive issue. Taşlı Köprü is Turkish name variant, Vojinović/Vojinović Bridge is Serbian variant. Thank you. Photo Balkan (talk) 10:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- No, its not, stop misleading us, none will buy it again. Taşlı Köprü is NOT Turkish name, as far as it is obvious, and Vojinović Bridge is English common name. Vojinovića most is Serbian variant. Therefor, we should not use wrong version, Taşlı Köprü, 0 google books, as that is questionable and most possibly wrong name. I will propose File:Vojinović Bridge overview, Vučitrn, April 2010.jpg. --WhiteWriter speaks 14:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- File renaming issue
The file was renamed by WhiteWriter in 25 March 2012. I revert as no valid rename reason given.
In 20 June 2013 WhiteWriter add {{Rename}} template. It was renamed by Sebleouf half an hour later with the strange reason: File renaming criterion #4: Change meaningless bio-names into binomial scientific names. I revert it.
Generally, file can be renamed in one of the reasons mentioned in Commons:File renaming#Which files should be renamed?. Please remember also that Commons is not wikipedia. The issue of Neutral point of view is different. File should not be rename just because is politically motivated.
regarding to this file. According to discussion above I dont see that the file is misleading. So I do not see reson to rename. Geagea (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- Template fact
I dont see problem adding the template {{Fact}}, but first clear out what is the exact disputed fact. Geagea (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
