User:F. Riedelio/Quality Image Promotion/2023

Quality Image Promotion 2023

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krankenhaus 002 2015 03 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krankenhaus 003 2023 01 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mannheim Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1 3 001 2022 03 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eis 002 2015 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Krankenhaus 001 2015 03 24.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krankenhaus 001 2015 03 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griffe 003 2022 03 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griffe 004 2023 02 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzfahrtschiff-Passagierschiff 003 2016 06 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but air is noisy --Michielverbeek 10:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Griffe 002 2015 09 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Btw ."nichtbiologischer Bestandteil Griff(?)". What's the biological part of this door? --Der Angemeldete 10:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)  Answered I have deleted this statement in Wikidata. --F. Riedelio 10:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Motel 003 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Motel 004 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Motel 001 2005 08 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baby-Bauernhoftiere 001 2014 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baby-Bauernhoftiere 004 2017 06 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nach oben schauen 002 2020 06 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nach oben schauen 004 2022 09 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baby-Bauernhoftiere 002 2014 03 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 17:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nach oben schauen 003 2022 03 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Starnberger See 001 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Starnberger See 002 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Schellenbergmoor 001 2023 04 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Schellenbergmoor 002 2023 04 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Schellenbergmoor 004 2023 04 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Schellenbergmoor 005 2023 04 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Starnberger See 003 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The noise should be reduced. --Ermell 19:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feder 003 2016 05 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feder 004 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feder 001 2011 02 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, nice use of exposure and ambient. --多多123 09:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feder 002 2015 06 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Makrofotografie 001 2020 05 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Mike Peel 18:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Makrofotografie 002 2021 06 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Mike Peel 18:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Makrofotografie 003 2021 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sieben prismatische Farben 003 2023 03 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sieben prismatische Farben 001 2020 09 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice rainbow, though diffuse, but please eliminate the halo of green CA on top of the building. -- Ikan Kekek 02:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)  New version CA removed and noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)  Support I think there's still a little green halo on top of the chimney that extends slightly past the green part of the rainbow, but I definitely think it's minor enough to pass this. -- Ikan Kekek 06:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment Improved with Photoshop --F. Riedelio 13:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)  Comment Well-done! Your comment somehow reset the status of this nomination from "Promotion" to "Nomination." -- Ikan Kekek 17:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolpersteine Loew Ludwigshafen 002 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically clean, subjects sharp --PantheraLeo1359531 15:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 005 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sieben prismatische Farben 002 2021 02 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 006 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 007 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 011 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 012 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 016 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 16:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 018 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 16:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 021 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 022 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 023 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 024 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 025 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 026 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 027 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 028 2023 03 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 029 2023 03 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 030 2023 03 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 031 2023 03 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 032 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 036 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 037 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 16:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 009 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 033 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 034 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 020 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp motif --PantheraLeo1359531 18:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigshafen Ludwigsplatz 13 A 006 2023 06 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:17, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stolperstein Ludwigshafen 035 2023 03 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elmstein Hauptstraße 142 001 2017 05 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Trauriges Bild, aber sehr gut fotografiert -- Spurzem 07:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elmstein Hauptstraße 142 002 2017 05 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elmstein Hauptstraße 142 004 2017 05 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ein halb 003 2023 06 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ein halb 004 2023 07 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klimawandel 001 2014 03 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klimawandel 003 2016 06 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elmstein Hauptstraße 142 003 2017 05 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Darker areas too noisy, sky maybe also burnt --Poco a poco 17:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 17:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Not sure what you did, the noise level is fine now but you applied more brightness to the sky and also to the roof, which doesn't look realistic at all Poco a poco 09:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)  New version Sky slightly darkened. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC) In comparison to the first version the sky and the roof are still brighter. Can you please keep the curves from the first version and the denoising of the current version? --Poco a poco 17:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)  New version First version with noise reduction uploaded. --F. Riedelio 07:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Not a solid QI to me but good to go --Poco a poco 08:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Barbarossaweg 2 001 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 5 004 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 12:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Barbarossaweg 2 004 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Barbarossaweg 2 005 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 004 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 007 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 10 003 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 08:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 1 002 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks like both sides are leaning out --Poco a poco 19:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved, new perspective correction. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 09 001 2023 04 02-Verbessert-RR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 10 002 2023 04 02-Verbessert-RR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirse 002 2023 08 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hirse 004 2023 08 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 002 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 004 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 006 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 008 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 009 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 010 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 011 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 013 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 014 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 001 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 015 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 016 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 019 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 026 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:36, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 027 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 020 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 028 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 032 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 033 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 021 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:56, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 023 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Weipertshauser Straße 1 002 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 07 001 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 07 003 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little bit noisy but good quality. --Terragio67 16:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 030 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise should be reduced --Ermell 20:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 034 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The noise should be reduced. --Ermell 20:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 017 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you remove the noise and add some sharpness? --Ermell 20:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved with AI. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 16:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ammerland Nördliche Seestraße 11 002 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 10:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ammerland Nördliche Seestraße 13 001 2023 04 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:27, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 07 006 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 10 002 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 10 003 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ktkvtsh 18:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Seeuferstraße 23 001 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much noise --Poco a poco 18:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Better --Poco a poco 18:21, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 012 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 015 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 022 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 024 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 13 002 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:46, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 003 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 016 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 004 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 005 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 007 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:58, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 009 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 13 004 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 14:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 010 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (maybe a bit noisy in the ceiling? but still looks ok to me) --ThibautRe 20:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise reduced. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 14:17, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Seeuferstraße 23 003 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit noisy on the door, fixable? --Grunpfnul 08:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 06:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 023 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laquearius 08:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 009 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 005 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some more perspective correction. --C messier 18:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Perspective correction improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 15:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:50, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strand 003 2016 06 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strand 004 2017 11 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 001 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Barbarossaweg 2 002 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --20 upper 18:20, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Barbarossaweg 2 003 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 002 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 005 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 006 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 008 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 5 003 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Gotenweg 003 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 10 004 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:25, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Hauptstraße 63 65 (zwischen) 003 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 19:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 1 001 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 011 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 011 2015 07 09 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments overexposed sky --Charlesjsharp 09:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Sky darkened. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)  Support. Good quality -- Spurzem 13:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 018 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slight DoF problem at upper left corner, but not critical IMO. OK --LexKurochkin 06:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 005 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ThibautRe 13:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 007 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 012 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 030 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:35, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 012 2015 07 09 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments overexposed sky --Charlesjsharp 09:42, 24 September 2023 (UTC)  New version Sky darkened. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 10:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)  Support thanks --Charlesjsharp 10:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 024 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 025 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 029 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 031 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Weipertshauser Straße 1 001 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 10 001 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 15:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Seeuferstraße 23 002 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 15:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ammerland Nördliche Seestraße 11 001 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 001 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 003 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 007 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Holzbergstraße 07 002 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Ambach Seeuferstraße 25 001 2023 04 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 011 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 013 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 017 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 018 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 08:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 021 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 08:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Bahnhofstraße 5 (bei) 002 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 025 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 13 001 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 08:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 13 003 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 002 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 006 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Virtual-Pano 16:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedelsheim Kirchgasse 6 8 002 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and details --PantheraLeo1359531 18:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 10 001 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 11:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 009 2015 08 27 Kulturdenkmaeler Hassloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 088 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 092 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barum Karl der Große Straße 09 002 2023 04 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 17:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing Am Kirchberg 2 018 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 17:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Staudach Staudach 2 008 2023 04 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Münsing-Holzhausen Kirchbergstraße 10 008 2023 04 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose CA plus slightly blurred pulpit and cross, sorry --Virtual-Pano 18:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)  Support ok now --Virtual-Pano 19:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 096 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 083 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 087 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruppertsberg Obergasse 02 (zu) 099 2022 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for QI. --C messier 20:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schattenriss 004 2023 08 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:43, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 017 2015 05 06 Feuchtwiese im Bruch (Wiki Loves Earth 2015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schattenriss 002 2017 11 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite noisy and looks a bit overprocessed. --Plozessor 11:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now! --Plozessor 05:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schattenriss 001 2016 06 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy; as there's not much detail anyway it should be possible to further reduce the noise. --Plozessor 11:10, 26 October 2023 (UTC)  New version Noise improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Now the noise is gone, but the colors of the sky are too staggered. Either you exported it with too high JPG compression, or you should apply some blurring to the sky. --Plozessor 05:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)  New version Blurring the sky, thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC) The sky is still staggered (really low number of different orange tones with hard transitions). I think your editing was good but then you saved it with massive JPG compression (the file has only 85 KB). Do you think you can fix this? --Plozessor 08:39, 28 October 2023 (UTC)  New version Try to fix jpg compression. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 18:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Now! --Plozessor 18:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deidesheim Weinstraße 31 002 2005 10 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Pretty low res but ok --Poco a poco 14:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahrrad 001 2016 06 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 17:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahrrad 002 2017 11 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahrrad 003 2021 08 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahrrad 004 2023 07 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zu viele zum Zaehlen 002 2022 04 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zu viele zum Zaehlen 004 2023 08 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In einer Box 002 2017 08 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good picture. Maybe add something about minerals to the filename. --Plozessor 11:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! In einer Box 004 2023 11 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenaufgang 001 2023 02 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's not much in the photo, but it doesn't look noisy, which is good. Can you perspective correct the posts at the bottom please? --Mike Peel 20:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 17:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC) @F. Riedelio: Sorry, but something seems to have gone wrong in the new version, it has clear banding in the sky that wasn't there before. If you did extra denoising, could you undo that please? The corrections at the bottom look good. Thanks. Mike Peel 09:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC) @Mike Peel:  New version The stripes were obviously caused by the Lightroom add-on module "JPEG Optimizer". Thanks again for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Mike Peel 16:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)