User:Steindy/QI-Archiv06

Notice

For QIs from 1 May 2022 to 2 July 2022

Vorlage

[[Category:Quality images supported by Wikimedia Österreich in 20..]] [[Category:Taken with Canon EOS 7D Mark II]] [[Category:Taken with Canon EF 300mm F2.8L IS II USM]] [[Category:Quality Images by Steindy]] [[Category:Quality images of association football]]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (053).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 11:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Greenish on my Screen. Good quality. --Hangman'sDeath 12:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (016).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (058).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (059).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (054).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (065).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (079).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (080).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 15:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (081).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 17:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (052).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:57, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (085).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 10:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (046).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (090).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (091).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 05:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (086).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:03, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (109).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (111).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (112).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:33, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (094).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (061).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think it's a bit noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 22:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good composition. Overall good enough for QI and not noisy enough for decline. --Milseburg 14:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (115).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (118).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (119).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (120).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:08, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (128).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (130).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 21:31, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (131).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC) There is no EXIF so impossible to know if there has been downsizing on these images. Can you clarify please @Steindy: --Charlesjsharp 19:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (132).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (133).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (134).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (102).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (139).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:12, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (141).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support All toes and fingertips are there. --Palauenc05 12:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 12:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:02, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (151).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (152).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (153).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (154).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --NightWolf1223 03:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (156).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (157).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (150).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:51, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (160).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (161).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (162).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (163).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (006).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 13:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:38, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:12, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (136).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (029).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Personality Rights Warning must be applied; there are children in the photo.--Peulle 11:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (041).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (043).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (048).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (026).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:31, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SC Wiener Neustadt vs. SK Austria Klagenfurt 2015-10-20 (140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (060).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Terragio67 11:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (065).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (067).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (070).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:32, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

--Pi bot (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (075).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (076).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 21:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (082).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (084).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (085).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (087).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (093).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 12:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (095).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 12:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (089).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:16, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (103).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (105).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (106).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (108).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (109).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (110).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (098).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 15:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (117).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (118).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (112).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (120).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (122).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:10, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (125).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:43, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (127).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (128).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (129).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (121).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (123).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (124).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just over the bar IMHO --Poco a poco 17:25, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (090).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 15:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (136).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (139).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:25, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 18:33, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (130).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (133).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 05:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (135) Sebastian Prödl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 05:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (141).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just over the bar --Poco a poco 11:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (142).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 09:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (145).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (100).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, given the cirscumstances. --C messier 16:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (151).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (153).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (147).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (148).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (149).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (160).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (154).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (161).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (163).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (166).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (169).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (170).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (162).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (164).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (165).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (115).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (171).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (175).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Poco a poco 15:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (176).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (178).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (180).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:16, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (181).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (183) Marcel Büchel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (143).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 20:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (190).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (192).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (193).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (194).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (187) Sandro Wieser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (197).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (001).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (002).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (005).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (008).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AUT vs. LIE 2015-10-12 (195).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (012).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FC Admira Wacker vs. SK Sturm Graz 2015-27-05 (017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:31, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)