User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/November 2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of light maybe, but QI nevertheless--Jebulon 22:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC) QI to me also, but the image needs a little perspective correction IMO--Lmbuga 22:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Error, sorry, no problem--Lmbuga 22:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Vecchio - Sala dell'Udienza - ceilings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 17:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Vecchio - Sala dei Gigli - ceilings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 17:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moshe Vardi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 10:51, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Florence Duomo - main gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality. --Kroton 14:59, 11 November 2011 (UTC)  OpposeI am pretty much disappointed that QI is given to pictures of artwork where no attempt is even made to mention or research the name of the artist--Moroder 23:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC) The author of the central gate of the portal is not mentionned in the Wikipedia articles linked from the image caption. However, the category of the portal makes a reference to some Italian artist. I guess somebody who knew better than me provided the information. I see no point in writing a full article in the image page when the architecture of the wiki gives better information than the one I could provide, and in a structured way. I will add some date information in the portal category, though. --Eusebius 21:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)  Support QI to me, very goog quality--Lmbuga 03:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)  Support QI for me, but the caption is a bit low. --Archaeodontosaurus 13:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)  Support I was there, it looks so. I've added two illustrated notes of details, please delete if inappropriate. Yes the caption could be better, but links are good. I agree that we should be in QI less lenient (in general, not regarding this picture) with the file names, the description pages and the categories...--Jebulon 15:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Elekhh 13:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul - decorated house in Karaköy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition, althought the police car should've been fully on there, but good enough. Mvg, Basvb 22:13, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Pignerolle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support better view of the building. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Not sure about if the trees are good or bad for the value of these images, but detail is better here. In the competing image the reliefs can barely be seen.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Château de Pignerolle.jpg: +0
2. Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: +2
=>
File:Château de Pignerolle.jpg: Declined.
File:Château de Pignerolle (Eusebius).jpg: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius 10:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)