User talk:Florent Abel/Archives/2010

Archives Archives 2007 Archives 2008 Archives 2009 Archives 2010 Archives 2011

Projet Monuments Historiques français

Dear Commons user, We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français ! In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français. We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont sur l'Arros à Saint-Sever-de-Rustan (Hautes-Pyrénées, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 09:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)- Thanks. Florent Pécassou 16:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comignevestiges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Archaeodontosaurus 20:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks. Florent Pécassou 15:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC) Comment Tempted to move it to "Discuss" because there is too much perspective distortion. --Iotatau 20:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairie d'Odos.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --High Contrast 20:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:symbols of ...

Bonjour, tu as construit plusieurs Category:Symbols of nom-de-la-ville , qui ne contiennent qu'un ou deux Fichiers, c'est dommage, puisqu'ils se montrent bien mieux dans la category de la ville elle-même, et en faisant des cat-scans, cette souscategorie ne se montre que mal. Selon moi, ce sont des categories intermédiaires superflues et il est mieux de remplir la Category:Coats of arms of cities in Hautes-Pyrénées. Merci d'avance. --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

• Je trouvais cette dénomination plus pratique afin de pouvoir intégrer d'autres éléments que des écussons dans cette catégorie (ex:drapeaux, panneaux d'entrée au sein d'une collectivité...). (cf: Category:Symbols of Pyrénées-Atlantiques.) Cette dénomination semble avoir été généralisée en ce qui concerce les catégories mères des départements. En plus de leur présence dans cette catégorie, peut-être serait-il cependant souhaitable en effet de faire figurer les écussons sur les pages d'accueil ou au sein de la catégorie mère s'il n'en existe pas (ainsi que dans celles du type Category:Coats of arms of cities in Hautes-Pyrénées)... Je pense que c'est là ta volonté. Florent Pécassou (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Oui, Coats of arms est à un haut niveau une subcategorie de symbols et je préfère une arborescence parallèle plutôt qu'une arborescence enchevêtrée, donc que le fichier ait Category:Coats of arms of... et Category:symbols of ..., ainsi gardant le ficher dans l'arborescence des coats of arms. Regardez la dichotomie entre coats et symbols ici: Category:Coats of arms of Pyrénées-Atlantiques, les coa's des departements ne quittent pas l'arborescence coats of arms. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau Laganne.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Miramont-d'Astarac Church, Gers, France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very saturated, but OK. --Ikar.us 01:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Distorsion

Bonjour.

Je ne suis pas un fan absolu de verticalité, surtout quand elle est artificielle parce que recréée. J'aime bien celles de vos photos que vous présentez en QI, mais à chaque fois je me dis que vous allez essuyer un "sorry, need perspective correction" ou un "bad distorsion" ou quelque chose du genre qui justifiera un cadre rouge... La dernière photo que vous avez publiée (le château de Laréole) souffre lui aussi de cet aspect "circulaire" qui gêne nos amis. Je le regrette et je trouve que c'est dommage. J'aimerais que plus de vos images soient promues, car j'aime bien ce que vous proposez. Ne disposant pas moi-même de matériel (logiciel) permettant de "redresser" les murs penchés, je préfère du coup m'abstenir de publier des images de bâtiments, parce que c'est toujours les mêmes réflexions. Je n'ai pas votre courage, peut-être. Bien cordialement.----Jebulon (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je propose, avant tout, mes photographie afin d'obtenir un avis et tant pis si elles ne sont pas promues... Avec le temps, j'espère pouvoir prédire du premier coup d'oeil celles qui seront promues... A bientôt. Florent Pécassou (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts 1870 (Mirande, Gers, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Je pense que c'est une QI. Belles couleurs, belle composition. Netteté. Sujet peu traité.--Jebulon 22:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts d'Espoey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --George Chernilevsky 05:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville d'Espoey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- MJJR 20:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancienne chapelle romane (Mont-de-Marsan, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Le sol et la pancarte sont un peut trop clair --Archaeodontosaurus 06:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ducourneau Theater (Agen, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Comment Perspective correction necessary --Archaeodontosaurus 06:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)) -- New version uploaded... -- Florent Pécassou 11:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC) Good to me.--Jebulon 16:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)* Comment "les murs ne sont pas droits" --Archaeodontosaurus 09:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Madeleine d'Albi, Tarn, France.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Aberration chromatique dans le ciel le magenta ne devrait pas s'y trouver dans cette quantité. --Archaeodontosaurus 14:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Où ça ?--Jebulon 20:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)*  Comment New version with corrections, but I can not vote now --Archaeodontosaurus 07:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC) good enough for QI now, IMO--Jebulon 23:14, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de Miélan (Gers, France).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Yes, but needs to be centered--Jebulon 22:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)