Commons:Help desk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

  Welcome   Community portal   Help desk
Upload help
  Village pump
copyright • proposals
  Administrators' noticeboard
vandalism • user problems • blocks and protections
Skip to table of contents
Wikimedia Commons help desk in other languages:

Alemannisch | العربية | asturianu | Boarisch | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 |  | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | मराठी | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | suomi | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文 | Zazaki | +/−

Deutsch: Diese Seite ist ein Forum für Benutzer der Commons. Hier darfst du jede Frage in der Sprache stellen, die du bevorzugst. Wenn du schnellere Hilfe benötigst, besuche bitte den Live-Chat-Raum #wikimedia-commons im IRC! Am einfachsten geht dies mit dem Webchat.
English: This page is a forum for users on Commons. Feel free to ask any question in any language you like. For quicker help please refer to the live chat room #wikimedia-commons on IRC! For quick access, you may use this link.
Español: Esta página es un foro para los usuarios de Commons. Siéntete libre de preguntar cualquier cosa en el idioma que prefieras. Para una ayuda más rápida, por favor pasa por el canal de charla en vivo #wikimedia-commons en el IRC. Puedes entrar aquí.
Français: Cette page est un forum pour les utilisateurs sur Commons. N'hésitez pas à poser vos questions dans votre langue préférée. Pour une aide plus interactive, pensez à visiter le canal de discussion #wikimedia-commons sur IRC.
Galego: Esta páxina é un foro para os usuarios de Commons. Síntete libre de preguntar calquera cousa no idioma que prefiras. Para unha axuda máis rápida, por favor, pasa pola canle de charla en directo #wikimedia-commons no IRC! Podes entrar seguindo esta ligazón.
Italiano: Questa pagina è un forum per i utenti di Commons. Sentiti libero di porre qualsiasi domanda in qualsiasi lingua preferisci. Per un aiuto urgente per favore entra nella chat room live #wikimedia-commons in IRC!
Polski: Ta strona jest miejscem dyskusji dla użytkowników Commons. Możesz zadać dowolne pytanie w dowolnym języku. Jeżeli zależy ci na szybkiej odpowiedzi wejdź na kanał #wikimedia-commons w sieci IRC! Jeśli nie znasz angielskiego, wejdź na polskojęzyczną stronę, gdzie też możesz uzyskać pomoc.
Português: Está página é um fórum para usuários no Commons. Sinta-se livre para fazer qualquer pergunta em qualquer idioma que preferir. Para ajuda rápida, por favor usar o canal de chat ao vivo #wikimedia-commons e no IRC.
Svenska: Om du vill ställa nybörjarfrågor på svenska, är du välkommen till den svenskspråkiga Bybrunnen här på Wikimedia Commons eller att tjatta på IRC-kanalen #wikipedia-sv.
Македонски: Оваа страница е форум за корисници на Ризницата (Commons). Слободно поставете било какво прашање на било кој јазик. За да добиете помош во живо, обратете се на каналот #wikimedia-commons на ИРЦ!
മലയാളം: കോമൺസിലെ പുതിയ ഉപയോക്താക്കൾക്ക് ഈ താൾ ഫോറം പോലെ ഉപയോഗിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്. കോമൺസിനെ സംബന്ധിച്ച ഏതൊരു ചോദ്യവും ഏതൊരു ഭാഷയിലും ചോദിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്. പെട്ടന്നുള്ള സഹായത്തിന് ഐ.ആർ.സി.യിലെ #wikimedia-commons എന്ന ചാനൽ ഉപയോഗിക്കാവുന്നതാണ്! ചാനലിലേയ്ക്ക് നേരിട്ട് പ്രവേശിക്കാൻ ഈ കണ്ണി ഉപയോഗിക്കാം.
한국어: 이 문서는 공용의 새로운 사용자들을 위한 포럼으로, 자신이 원하는 어떤 언어로든지 자유롭게 질문을 할 수 있습니다. 보다 빠르게 도움을 얻고 싶다면 IRC#wikimedia-commons 채팅 채널을 이용해보세요!
日本語: この頁はコモンズの新規利用者のためのフォーラムです。 何語でもかまわないのでお気軽に質問をお書きください。迅速なサポートを希望するときはIRCチャットの#wikimedia-commonsの利用もお考えください。
中文(简体)‎: 这是一个给维基共享资源新用户使用的论坛。请随意发问,用任何语言都没问题,但使用英文的话通常能获得更快的解答。另外您也可以使用中文版的互助客栈。如需快速帮助,请参阅在IRC上的实时聊天室#wikimedia-commons!如需快速访问,请使用这个链接
中文(繁體)‎: 這是一個給維基共享資源新用戶使用的論壇。請隨意發問,用任何語言都沒問題,但使用英文的話通常能獲得更快的解答。另外您也可以使用中文版的互助客棧。如需快速幫助,請參閱在IRC上的實時聊天室#wikimedia-commons!如需快速訪問,請使用這個連結
עברית: דף זה הוא מקום לשאול שאלות עבור משתמשים חדשים בוויקימדיה קומונס. הרגישו חופשי לשאול את שאלתכם בכל שפה, אך פניות באנגלית ובשפות אירופאיות נפוצות יענו מהר יותר.
This help desk is a forum for questions and help on

How to use Commons

Anyone, from newbie to experienced, can ask a question here. Questions will be replied to here as well. Any answers you receive are not legal advice and the responder cannot be held liable for them. Please sign your question by typing four tildes (~~~~). In order to get quick answers consider the following points:

Resolved sections (marked by {{section resolved|1=~~~~}}) will be archived after four days. Sections with no discussion will be archived after ten days.

Commons discussion pages (index)

Upload two or more files - gives them the same name[edit]

At least twice when I've tried to upload two or more files at the same time, it gives them the same name, which causes problems. Is this a known bug? Bubba73 (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

It's something I've seen reported here on Commons before. There are so many bugs for the Upload Wizard in Phabricator that I can't find a specific bug number, though. LX (talk, contribs) 21:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Equally as bad but easily solved is something I have come across whilst whittling down Category:Media requiring a split up, in that quite a few times a user has uploaded several files at the same time and they have ended up as versions of the same file. See for example File:Ek1211.JPG and File:Церква_у_с._Щорсівка.jpg, before they get split. Green Giant (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
It would certainly help if it worked properly when uploading a group of related photos - same user license info, same categories, similar description, etc. Bubba73 (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I uploaded files recently and did not have this issue. The Upload Wizard let me give my own names for them. This might be Symbol unrelated.svg Unrelated, but it might help at the same time. DLindsley Need something? 02:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

What is the definition of "implicit pornographic images"?[edit]

Category:Child pornography has a blurb which refers to this term. I am wondering where exactly goes the demarcation between alllowed and disallowed images which depict items of such contraband? __meco (talk) 12:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I've BOLDly killed the WEASEL before it can bite us here. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Seems like a reasonable clarification. __meco (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Valentina Carnelutti[edit]

Hello, I uploaded two files on Valentina Carnelutti wikipedia page ( and the were deleted because I declared I had the rights on them. I want to know how I can upload again those photos and prove that I have the right to publish them.

Please help me, I'm quite new and really don't know how to.

Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommaso.desantis (talk • contribs) 11:36, 17 February 2015‎ (UTC)

I'm afraid permission to publish is not sufficient. What is needed is permission from the legitimate copyright holder to publish the content under a free license (a copyright license that allows anyone to use, modify and distribute the content for any purpose, including commercial purposes). Note that the copyright holder of a photograph is typically the author of the photograph – in other words: the photographer – and not the person appearing in the photograph. Please see Commons:OTRS for instructions on how to obtain and send in an appropriate permission statement. You should not attempt to recreate previously deleted content yourself, as doing so may result in your account being blocked. LX (talk, contribs) 11:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Better version available[edit]

Correction-Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-pone.0118172.s001.ogv fixes an issue in Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-Individualization-pone.0110179.s022.ogv. What's the easiest way to merge these two files into one unified Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-pone.0118172.s001.ogv? @Daniel Mietchen: for info and thanks. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

It depends on what you mean by "merge". A history merge or a video merge? The history one is easy - move one file to the new name and then try to move the second one to the same new name. It won't be moved immediately but the dialogue box will offer the option of deleting the existing file and then moving. Once that is done, it is a simple matter of deleting it and then restoring everything. Easily done if that is what you are looking for. A video merge is not something I am too good at. Green Giant (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't think we should go for a video merge. The main reason for keeping File:Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-Individualization-pone.0110179.s022.ogv would be to preserve the integrity of the original work in the context of a full-text import into Wikisource (we're working on that, as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Open Access/Signalling OA-ness), but I don't think that's a strong reason. So I could imagine either leaving things as they are, or redirecting File:Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-Individualization-pone.0110179.s022.ogv to File:Correction-Measuring-What-Latent-Fingerprint-Examiners-Consider-Sufficient-Information-for-pone.0118172.s001.ogv. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright/license help with File:Steinway factory Schanzenstrasse Hamburg Germany.jpg[edit]

I have uploaded a picture (File:Steinway factory Schanzenstrasse Hamburg Germany.jpg) that is from 1915. The author is unknown. I have used the license tag {{PD-old-auto}}. I would like if someone will check if the license/copyright is correct and legal. Thank you. --Nobelpeopleuploader (talk) 14:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Discussion underway at VPC. Anon126 ( ) 01:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Uploading a picture of a theorist[edit]

If a picture is on images in a google search can it be uploaded to a wiki page? Nickesha Senior (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

No; Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. So you need to ensure before uploading that they are explicitly freely licensed, or in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. Jee 05:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Self-taken Venue Pictures[edit]

Can I upload pictures I've taken of a concert venue which I took before a concert at The Forum Inglewood. -- Smilerslove (talk) 06:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Probably, as long as they are not (for example) violations of someone's privacy rights or simply photos of other people's copyrighted work. Certainly nothing in the fact that its a concert venue or that you took the photos before a concert is a problem. - Jmabel ! talk 07:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

File transfer difficulties[edit]

Hi there! For some reason, I'm having trouble transferring a file (ja:ファイル:ちえりあ.JPG) to commons, trying both the commons helper and manual upload options. Both methods seem to have an infinite runtime with no progress, something I've not experienced before when uploading to Wiki or commons. Is this just an odd problem happening locally on my laptop, or is there something strange about the file? --Prosperosity (talk) 10:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

help with catscan[edit]

Can I find with catscan which files are in one or two specified categories only? Thanks--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

my pictures[edit]

Hi I don't understand why I can t put my personal pictures from my work Im an artist sculptor from Paris, do you have someones in Paris who can explain me how it worksis too complicated for me in english ! My email is Thanks a lot Best regards Patrick Laroche — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)

what to do with file that has two different dates[edit]

  • File:Homesteader NE 1866.png is dated 1866 in the file name, but the description says:
  • Description: "The Covered Wagon of the Great Western Migration. 1886 in Loup Valley, Nebr." A family poses with the wagon in which they live and travel daily during their pursuit of a homestead.
  • Date: 1886
  • Source: NARA - ARC Identifier 518267

Does it seem more likely that the uploader used the wrong date in naming the file, or that the uploader made a mistake in the description? If the former, is it possible to rename the file? Is this the place to ask questions like this, or is there another? Thanks, EChastain (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

According to the archive its from 1866, I updated the description to match the source. Abigor talk 17:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@Abigor: I undid your change to the original caption, because it’s a quote from the source materials, but I added the archive title and marked the anomalous date [sic]. OK?—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • (Edit conflict)The file can be found at the US national archives and has the same anomaly. The file name and description are the same here as at the archives, so I don't know which date is right. However, I reckon given the filename and description they are on the Oregon Trail and the 1866 date is correct. ColonialGrid (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks all! That takes care of it. (And I learned something!) EChastain (talk) 18:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Cannot look at a file that is marked by File:Name.jpg[edit]

I don't understand how this file works. I want to look at b:de:File:Altar.JPG and was redirected to b:de:File:Name.jpg. OK, the name "Altar.JPG" isn't a strong name – see File:ALTAR.jpg or File:Altar..jpg (2 dots!) or File:Altar.png. But I'm not able to look at the original file in Wikibooks and to check whether the file is useful.

In Commons, I found out that the original file was moved to File:Altar Loreto Church Manila.jpg, and its recreation was protected showing File:Name.jpg. The behaviour in Commons maybe OK, but the behaviour in other projects is confusing IMHO. Perhaps, you can show a more informative page. -- Juergen (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

You say "I want to look at b:de:File:Altar.JPG". Is there a page on b:de that links to that file name? Apparently, there was no local file with that name on b:de. It may refer to one of the seven files that were uploaded to Commons under that file name between 2008 and 2014. The current names of those seven files can be seen in the log for File:Altar.JPG. You could look in the history of the b:de page and see when the link was inserted. And then look if one of the seven files was hosted under that name on Commons on that date. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
That's my problem: "You could look in the history of the b:de page" No, I can't. There is no page b:de:File:Altar.JPG. I was automatically redirected to b:de:File:Name.jpg WITHOUT a link back to the Altar file. Therefore, I'm not able to look at the history on b:de. The browser shows the needed address, not the shown page. As I said, the Commons history explained the situation, but the de-WB situation is confusing. -- Juergen (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Let's take this from the beginning. The first basic question is: why did you want to look at a non-existent file? A reason would be because you followed a link from some other page. That's why my question was: Is there (or was there) a page (article, user page, etc.) on de.wikibooks that includes (or included) a link to File:Altar.JPG? I assumed that was the case. So, the suggestion about "the history of the b:de page" meant the history of that article or other page. That was to help find what the target of the link could have been at the moment of its insertion. But if you didn't follow a link, then we're back to the first question: why did you want to look at a non-existent file? If it was out of curiosity to know if a file currently existed under that file name, well, as we have seen, there is no such file, although there have been several files that were moved to other file names, which can be seen in the logs. If it's because you wanted to upload a file locally to de.wikibooks under that particular file name, that may be possible, although maybe not a good idea, for the same reason that file name is not recommended on Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for misunderstanding. I'm testing some features of my local bot and looked for local stored files. For that first I wrote in the default search box (at the right top) "Datei:Alt" and chose the first file that was shown as existing file by auto-completing. All the following steps confused me until I found the reasons at Commons. Why is this file shown as existing? Why am I redirected inside WB without any hint whether the wanted file exists or doesn't? Is there any hidden redirect? My problem is not to find a suitable file but to understand the confusing situation: a file that doesn't exist is shown as existing. -- Juergen (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright help regarding File:A.dahiya.jpg[edit]

Kindly let me know whether I can use pic from google images in wiki ? Thanks In advance --Nupur2000 (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

No. That file is not from Google, although you may have found it there. Search engines don’t care about copyright or reuse; you have to look at the terms under which each image has been published. In this case, according to its Terms of use the source website “grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited right and license to access and use this Site for your personal, non-commercial and recreational or informational purposes.” This is a long way from a free licence, so images from that site cannot be hosted here without express permission from the owners.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
[via edit conflict] Certainly not this one (which ought to be speedy-deleted). "from google images" just means you found it in a search, which says literally nothing about its copyright status, let along whether it would be in Commons' scope; in short, finding a file in Google Images has literally no relevance to whether it is suitable for Commons. - Jmabel ! talk 00:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Please read your talk page messages before trying to upload anything else. As you've already been told: "unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here" (original emphasis). LX (talk, contribs) 21:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Resolved
I think that this question was replied to adequately based on the supplied information. If you have anything to add or a follow-up question please feel free to replace this box with your comment. This section will be archived after four days. LX (talk, contribs) 21:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Parsing errors[edit]

The following are in Category:Pages using Information template with parsing errors, and I can see that they don't parse, but I can't quickly see what is wrong with them.

- Jmabel ! talk 21:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The first one was missing a pipe between the {{information}} template name and its first parameter, description. The rest were missing the pipe, the parameter name and the equal sign. LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Duh. Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 07:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Resolved
I think that this question was replied to adequately based on the supplied information. If you have anything to add or a follow-up question please feel free to replace this box with your comment. This section will be archived after four days. Jmabel ! talk 07:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest?[edit]

I recently uploaded some deck diagrams[1][2][3] from my website and in each description said that the image originated from my new website: (but with a link). My understanding is that this is accepted practice to link to the source and there is no problem with image authors linking to their website in the description, even if it's a "commercial" entity, but I wanted to double-check. Also, is there any COI concerns to my adding one of the diagrams to the "Construction" section of the Deck (building) Wikipedia page?

I'm about to start on a deck in a few weeks and I'd like to upload some actual photography (with annotations) eventually as well in a similar fashion. So I just wanted to be doubly sure before anyone yells at me for spamming deck images with links to my website as the source. CorporateM (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

You don't seem to be spamming us with your images, so they should be inside our scope. They'll be outside our scope, however, if you spam, so you are thinking right. DLindsley Need something? 02:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
If the images have been previously published on another website, you should indeed provide a link. Unless the site contains a statement matching the license used when uploading to Commons, you may also need to send in a permission statement via e-mail. As for the question regarding Wikipedia, you should probably ask at whichever language edition of Wikipedia you have in mind. Rules are different on different projects. Commons:Guidance for paid editors has more information. LX (talk, contribs) 06:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
I've read both pages now; very helpful. Thank you! I didn't realize Commons had a specific scope other than being a repository of free images and may have gotten in trouble there without your guidance. I will make sure to only upload images with educational value. I'd like to upload some later with the same annotations showing the anatomy of a deck, but with real photographs, instead of a drawn diagram, but I may upload fewer images than I would have otherwise. Thanks again! CorporateM (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Resolved
I think that this question was replied to adequately based on the supplied information. If you have anything to add or a follow-up question please feel free to replace this box with your comment. This section will be archived after four days. LX (talk, contribs) 16:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

how to start a group[edit]

We would like to establish a group where we share your own photos as well as photos of other users. Is such a thing possible? Thank Helcapas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helcapas (talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 February 2015‎ (UTC)

  • I'm not exactly sure of your question, but if you are asking if you can start a group like on flickr, no. Please read COM:SCOPE to see what Commons' purpose is. If I misunderstood your question, can you please elaborate? ColonialGrid (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

How to delete a photo[edit]

I uploaded an image by accident that wasn't suppose to be uploaded to commons. How do I find it to delete it? Is that possible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingempireentertainment (talk • contribs)

  • Assuming it is recently uploaded, place {{Speedydelete|accidental upload}} at the top of the file page. - Jmabel ! talk 17:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


Are the pictures on Wikipedia copyright protected? That is, if I download a piece of famous artwork (in this case painting the Goldfinch), can I have it printed at a commercial print shop (in this case Walmart)?

Thank you for your time.

Laura J. Morris 419-545-0827

I'm afraid "painting the Goldfinch" isn't specific enough for me to know what image you are talking about; could you provide a URL?
If you really mean Wikipedia, then some are and some aren't, and you should ask on the Wikipedia for the relevant language, not here on Commons.
If you mean this site, Wikimedia Commons, then everything here should be either public domain (not copyrighted) or free-licensed (completely reusable, but possibly with some attribution requirements, etc., that will be spelled out on the particular file page).
Again, if you can indicate the specific URL, then someone can give you a specific answer for that image. - Jmabel ! talk 17:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Is there a special way to show an image is annotated?[edit]


I found an annotated image File:Albanian Alps from Air.jpg that cleared up questions I was having about the geography of Albania. Is there any special category that such images go into? I found it by luck. Thanks, EChastain (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, although it would be good if there was a way of doing it so that anyone categorising pages involving the mountains, valleys, passes etc. of Albania would know about it. Is there a way of doing that? Thanks, EChastain (talk) 18:18, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


I really would like to use this image:,_Pennsylvania_-_Hosiery._Minnesac_Mills._%28Man_working_at_machine_with_draped_stockings.%29_-_NARA_-_518692.jpg on my website. I read the copyrights and I still don't understand. At the bottom of the screen, it says that it's a 'public domain in the United States'; so does that mean I can use it?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webqueenhtc (talk • contribs)

  • Yes. Work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties can be used absolutely freely, with no copyright restrictions. It is generally considered polite to indicate what you know about where it came from, but it is not legally required. - Jmabel ! talk 00:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Unable to start file names with Scania[edit]

For some odd reason the upload tool will never let me start a file name with "Scania". That's when I define the filename to be on commons, not what the actual name was on the file that I uploaded from my computer. I've earlier uploaded files starting with different brand names, such as Volvo, but when I try with Scania, it only says that I need to define a proper file name, so I've had to put other names first to get those files uploaded. I have no reason to believe that it's the Scania name that has been blocked, so maybe it is a filter that is intended to block filenames from starting with "scan", based on scanned images? In that case it seems to be a bit too brute, and I guess it would block filenames starting with Scandinavia too, or any other name that has "scan" as the first part. Would it be possible to make an exception for these names? Bergenga (talk) 22:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

There is a line in MediaWiki:Titleblacklist that prevents uploading of any names that consist of the string "Scan" followed by zero or more letters and then the file extension. If I'm reading the rule correctly, you should not run into this if you have any non-letter characters (such as spaces, numbers or other symbols) in the name. If you do, please give an exact example of the full file name that you tried to use. LX (talk, contribs) 16:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Then this clearly doesn't work as intended, because I have always had other types of characters like digits, dashes or spaces in all file names I have tried to upload. Examples of filenames that have been blocked are "Scania IK 310 IB OmniLine.jpg" and "ScaniaK112CLClassic-VestTelemarkBilruter.jpg". They should both have passed through according to what you say, but they didn't. Bergenga (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Does the problem occur only when you try to upload through Upload Wizard or does it occur also with the basic upload form? -- Asclepias (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
I've only used the Upload Wizard, never tried the basic upload form before. I could always try to use the basic upload form and see if the same happens, but I don't have any Scania related photos ready for upload right now. But I may try it later tonight. (If I had been aware of the basic upload form I would have tried it before asking here.) Bergenga (talk) 22:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
I tried now with the basic upload form, and it all went smoothly this time. I guess I could use that form whenever I want to use a filename where this is a problem, but it seems to me that for other less experienced users who may have difficulties using anything but the wizard, this should be fixed somehow. Anyway it is nice to see that there is a workaround for me, so for me personally this case could be closed, but it may be that this should be fixed, since this clearly isn't working exactly as intended, and I'm not likely to be the only one running into this issue. Bergenga (talk) 23:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

You need to make a Wiki Commons section for educational / editorial licensed photos.[edit]

The policy here to only accept photos that can be used commercially goes against the educational foundation of the Wiki. I wasted a lot of time uploading 250 of my best photos to Wiki Commons only to have them all deleted. I had some of the best photos of their respective categories on Wiki Commons. Many of the photos I donated were unique and / or of historical significance.

I've been a photographer for 46 years, my work in in 92 museums and public collections around the world. I was willing to donate my photographs for educational use only as I am a documentary photographer and I do not obtain releases for commercial use. It is a disservice to the educational community to only accept commercial photos on Wiki Commons. Unless the Wiki Commons maintains model, product and location releases, your fooling yourself to say that your photos can be used for commercial advertising without releases on file. I hope things change in the future to make Wiki Commons open to more users and broaden it scope for educational / editorial users.

Best Regards,

Daniel D. Teoli Jr.

@Danielteolijr: I am sorry that you had the bad experience of having all of your contributions deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Danielteolijr. I especially regret that the upload process at Wikimedia Commons was insufficient in explaining to you how your photos would be used and what it means to upload them.
The decisions about best practices for licensing content for sharing on the Internet were mostly settled with the establishment of en:Creative Commons in about 2001. Since then several million people have commented on this licensing process and tens of millions more have decided to use the licenses. They are part of the international legal landscape, and at this point, enough people trust their validity and the 10+ years of extensive use that they have had to establish Wikimedia Commons and other similar projects. If the licenses are not sufficient for you to feel comfortable releasing content for personal use then it is best that your content is deleted.
Here on Wikimedia Commons, we need to have content available for commercial use so that they are available in education. Practically all textbooks are commercially published, many conferences are commercially managed, outside of the Western World many schools are operated on commercial models, and just in general, the Internet blurs lines between commercial and non-commercial publishing in so many ways that the community here for many years has decided that accepting media donations that could be used for any purpose, even commercially, is the best option here.
Model releases and personality rights are a completely separate issue from commercial use of photography, and our licensing here says nothing about that. Just because a photo is used commercially does not mean that the model has released personality rights, and that would require a release which Wikimedia Commons does not host or provide.
I am sorry you have had a bad experience here. I appreciate your donation even though it did not work out. If you have further questions about donating media to Commons then please ask. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Also, on the personality rights front, if that is at issue in a non-obvious way, I recommend the use of the template {{Personality rights}}. - Jmabel ! talk 17:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Media File Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Hi, I recently uploaded an image for a wiki draft. I received the image file directly from the author (It is for a film page) with their permission. The image file is the poster art for the film. After doing so successfully, I received this email message: "The media file has been nominated for deletion." I checked out why (need to get written permission from the author via the wiki permission template). I have filled in the permission template as required. One thing. It states that the permission template must be emailed from an email address that is recognized by wikipedia. My question is: Can I email it from my account as the author is not registered with wikipedia? Thanking you in advance. Nairbotanim (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The author does not have to be registered, but the permission should come from an e-mail address. LX (talk, contribs) 18:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Problem copyright - image blocked[edit]


First of all, let me introduce myself. My name is Julien Roosens. I work for the Belgian FA (football association, aka RBFA/URBSFA/KBVB) as brand manager. I have recently discovered that the pages concerning our organization still showed our old logo. I have tried to modify the publication by uploading the new logo.

But apparently, INeverCry (administrator/contributor) has deleted it due to "Copyright violation"

We are the owners of these Copyrights and I would like to lift the ban on this logo. Could you please tell me how to do it? It is very important to us to spread our new public image all over the web.

Thanks in advance for your support (and sorry for my poor English).

Kind regards,

Julien Roosens Corporate Communication RBFA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julien Roosens (talk • contribs)

@Julien Roosens: Hi,
All complex logos need a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Help on personal biography[edit]

What are the steps to download my personal biography/Enoobdog7$ (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Assuming that by "download" you mean "upload," and assuming you mean this site, we don't host biographies, although if you are an active user you are welcome to write briefly about yourself on your user page (User:Enoobdog7$). And if you are talking about Wikipedia, unless you are notable enough to merit an encyclopedia article, similar comments apply. - Jmabel ! talk 15:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

delete my file, i have the copyright[edit]

i am the owner of the picture, why delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melthorme (talk • contribs) 21:43, 26 February 2015‎ (UTC)

How did you come by the copyright for that picture? Are you the cover designer? --rimshottalk 22:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Convenience link: File:El Desconocido V.jpg - Jmabel ! talk 04:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)