User talk:Gzen92/QI/2022

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Jeanne-d'Arc - maison (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:15, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champ-de-Mars - éclairages (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison du Pèlerin (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au 15 boulevard Saint-Pierre (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check verticals, they are not straight --Nino Verde 08:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 09:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales - plaque (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales - statue (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Louis (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distillerie Fernet-Branca (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 15:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle du cimetière (Mackenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle du cimetière - intérieur (Mackenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix du cimetière (Mackenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Main subject maybe a bit too dark. --Ermell 09:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin du curé (Saint-Louis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Building verticals are not straight --Nino Verde 08:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenas (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenas (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenas (Colmar) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenas (Colmar) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenas d'amour (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good quality, and I wish the two lovers a long and happy relationship. -- Ikan Kekek 07:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Char du carnaval (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:00, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone sylvie (Anemone nemorosa) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champ d'anémone sylvie (Anemone nemorosa) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champ d'anémone sylvie (Anemone nemorosa) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcisse à bouquet (Narcissus tazetta) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcisse à bouquet (Narcissus tazetta) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Narcisses à bouquet (Narcissus tazetta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tête d'épingle (Colmar) (5 dioptries) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 07:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tête d'épingle (Colmar) (5 dioptries) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Xopolino 07:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vosgienne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 08:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pâquerette (Bellis perennis) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brasserie (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Lorette (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Lorette - intérieur (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Wendelin (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:56, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - côté (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château des Rohan - entrée (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville - clocher (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la guerre franco-allemande de 1870 (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Première Guerre mondiale (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts en hommage aux militaires (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:22, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aismallard 11:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alliaire officinale (Alliaria petiolata) (2 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pâquerette (Bellis perennis) (2 dioptries) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stellaire holostée (Stellaria holostea) (2 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 07:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, slight overexposure on bird/nest --Charlesjsharp 08:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arroseur (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice composition and colours. --Tagooty 01:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auberge de l'Ill (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel des berges (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Strasbourg (Mutzig).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:49, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipe précoce (Tulipa raddii).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Microcentrale hydroélectrique, barrage B2 (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check the verticals. --Ermell 09:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 12:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Microcentrale hydroélectrique, barrage B2 (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usine d'incinération des déchets (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too dark, but good enough IMO. --Tournasol7 07:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiwi (3 dioptries, stacking).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 09:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument Le Haut-Rhin à ses fils (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC) A war memorial category would be helpful. --Ermell 19:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mémorial (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 08:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeille (Apis mellifera) sur un pissenlit (Taraxacum) (2 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please identify bee --Charlesjsharp 14:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:32, 5 May 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 20:33, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fourmi (Formica rufa) (5 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments we need genus --Charlesjsharp 07:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)  Done  Support OK quality. --Charlesjsharp 08:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite pervenche (Vinca minor) (2 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul et clocher (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:51, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiwi (2 dioptries, stacking).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trèfle des prés (Trifolium pratense).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renoncule tête d'or (Ranunculus auricomus) (2 dioptries).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:06, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque du mémorial (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Oppose Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 20:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)  Support I'm not seeing anyplace where a perspective correction would be useful. Do you have the right photo? -- Ikan Kekek 07:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC) I made a correction on May 8, I probably forgot to mention it. Gzen92 06:55, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeilles (Apis mellifera) sur un cadre (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 14:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enfumoir (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:36, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruches (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Saint-Ulrich (528 m).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donjon du château du Saint-Ulrich (528 m) et vue sur Ribeauvllé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mur d'enceinte du château du Saint-Ulrich (528 m) (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitale pourpre (Digitalis purpurea) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment Very good, possible FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek 12:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue du village de Ribeauvillé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrée de la ruche (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon ramier (Columba palumbus), Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon ramier (Columba palumbus), Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeilles (Apis mellifera) sur un cadre (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality -- Spurzem 09:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponts couverts et cathédrale (Strasbourg) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coloeus monedula, Mutzig, Bas-Rhin, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side is leaning in --Poco a poco 09:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 11:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squelette (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Squelettes (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atelier désincarcération - pinces (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camion nacelle (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault Colorale (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergeronnette grise (Motacilla alba alba) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (63).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Saint-Ulrich (Ribeauvillé) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 16:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Dusenbach (Ribeauvillé) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and this sky looks right. I don't think it's likely that the sky was so much darker 2 minutes earlier; was it? -- Ikan Kekek 08:23, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Dusenbach - maître-autel (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough, I think. -- Ikan Kekek 08:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Dusenbach - nef (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanctuaire Notre-Dame de Dusenbach (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction required, please make sure that the verticals are straight --Uoaei1 13:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanctuaire Notre-Dame de Dusenbach - écriteau (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a white stripe at the top, please crop it --Uoaei1 13:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 16:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC) @Gzen92:  Oppose for now. The white stripe needs to be removed before this can be promoted! --Uoaei1 06:15, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Dusenbach (Ribeauvillé) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK but slightly too dark IMO --Ermell 21:44, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Députée Brigitte Klinkert (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 08:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfet Louis Laugier (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 05:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé - 152e RI - porte-drapeau (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé - police municipale (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Dusenbach (Ribeauvillé) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, except was the sky really that dark on 13 July 2022, 09:32:32? I'm thinking you should brighten it up somewhat. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)  Done It's better ? Gzen92 03:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)  Comment It's less dark, but was the sky really that dark at that time, and how was it so much brighter 2 minutes later, as shown in File:Chapelle_Notre-Dame_de_Dusenbach_(Ribeauvillé)_(3).jpg? -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC) The sky is the same as File:Chapelle_Notre-Dame_de_Dusenbach_(Ribeauvillé)_(1).jpg. For File:Chapelle_Notre-Dame_de_Dusenbach_(Ribeauvillé)_(3).jpg the sun was just to the left, so brighter. Gzen92 08:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)  Support OK, thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 02:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Véhicule de l'armée de terre (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Véhicule de l'armée de terre (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé motorisé - pompiers (Colmar) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a huge dust spot over the helicopter. Otherwise OK --Jakubhal 19:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Done Better ? Gzen92 06:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Yes, thank you --Jakubhal 11:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poule et ses poussins (Rhinau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Saint-Ulrich (Ribeauvillé) (2) edited (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 18:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château du Haut-Ribeaupierre (Ribeauvillé).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Défilé motorisé - pompiers (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Florent (Xonrupt-Longemer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but too dark. --Tournasol7 12:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Done It's better ? Gzen92 02:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Could still be a little lighter, but ok in my eyes --Milseburg 06:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why is there a blurred tree behind the helicopter? --Romainbehar 18:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Looks like hot air and fumes from the exhaust outlet. QI for me --Jakubhal 18:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)  Support per Jakubhal. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Support per Jakubhal. -- Smial 10:45, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Hello Jakubhal, at first I thought about exhaust fumes too. But the helicopter's exhaust is much higher and I can't imagine hot air falling straight down. For me, the blur is inexplicable. Best regards -- Spurzem 14:34, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Oppose Per Spurzem. --Sebring12Hrs 14:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Comment Der Rotor bläst das anscheinend mit Macht nach unten. --Smial 15:03, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Support per Jakubhal. --MB-one 16:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC) @Smial: Ich kann es mir nicht vorstellen, dass der Rotor die Abgase so gebündelt senkrecht nach unten treibt. Zumindest bei dem Eurocopter] werden sie waagerecht nach hinten rausgeblasen, was auch an der Verschmutzung zu sehen ist. Wir werden wahrscheinlich nicht herausfinden, woher die unscharfe Stelle im zu bewertenden Bild kommt. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem 18:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC) hier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai72vtvJcCw bei 2:24 oder auch hier: https://media04.meinbezirk.at/article/2017/05/18/2/10377702_L.jpg ganz gut zu sehen -- Smial 23:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)  Support I assume it's all because of the downdraft caused by the rotor blades, where the hot air is forced downwards. It has to be. The only way to sharpen the tree again is to shut down the engine. A QI for me.--Ximonic 11:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)  Comment Hello @Romainbehar, Jakubhal, Ikan Kekek, Smial, Spurzem, Sebring12Hrs, MB-one, and Ximonic: I made a video of the helicopter landing (File:Hélicoptère de la Gendarmerie (Xonrupt-Longemer).ogg), then photos at vertical take-off. It is not the gases that go down but the helicopter that goes up. Gzen92 [discuter] 12:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Good video. You can even see that the gas would probably try to go a little upwards too, but it can't get far up because of the strong drafts. (There is some blur even above the exhaust pipe.) So it mostly goes down, or slightly backwards, depending the movement. In anycase, it's a natural phenomenon, and not a photography related blur in anyway. --Ximonic 13:06, 22 July 2022 (UTC)  Support Looks good to me. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)  Support There is something white near the bottom of the frame that is inconsequential but does detract from the helicopter. The image would be imrproved if this white spot disappeared. --GRDN711 13:22, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - chaire (Bayeux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouette rieuse (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 22:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouette rieuse (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument (Bayeux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 14:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roue à aubes (Bayeux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue de la ville (Bayeux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouette rieuse (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) - tête (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caisson du port Mulberry B (Arromanches-les-Bains).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plan d'eau (Colleville-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue (Colleville-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe juive (Colleville-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre - portail (Caen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Colleville-sur-Mer) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Colleville-sur-Mer) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Colleville-sur-Mer) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Colleville-sur-Mer) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - nef (Bayeux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 01:40, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre (Caen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Clair (Fontaine-Henry).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre - intérieur - nef (Arromanches-les-Bains).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre - intérieur - orgue (Arromanches-les-Bains).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Char M4A4 Sherman DD (Courseulles-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (Caen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - porte des Champs (Caen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - église Saint-Georges (Caen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Houlgate).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Première Guerre mondiale (Houlgate).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker (Merville-Franceville-Plage) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker (Merville-Franceville-Plage) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand cormoran (Phalacrocorax carbo) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maisons (Cabourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Argentine (Cabourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa du Temps retrouvé (Cabourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Deauville).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:44, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du Marché (Deauville).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bâtiment - entrée (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrée (Reviers) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 07:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Reviers) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port (Deauville).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 05:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument (Courseulles-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Reviers) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --LexKurochkin 17:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Reviers) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 06:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison fleurie (Fontaine-Henry) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison fleurie (Fontaine-Henry) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hélicoptère (Graye-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 06:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 09:40, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - patte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - tête (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:49, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland marin (Larus marinus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:55, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (Courseulles-sur-Mer).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I believe that the bottom crop could be better (getting rid of the wall and benches) but still ok --Poco a poco 11:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Colomby-Anguerny).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Vigor (Colomby-Anguerny).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de la Nativité-de-Notre-Dame (Fontaine-Henry).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals should be corrected. --Ermell 13:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:05, 22 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Véronique à feuilles de saule (Veronica salicifolia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Reviers) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 11:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (Fontaine-Henry).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Are the tilted poles tilted for real or due to lack of perspective correction? --Poco a poco 11:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC) The one on the left was not vertical. Gzen92 06:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Cabourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted to the left --Llez 06:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Best ? Gzen92 07:12, 22 August 2022 (UTC)  Support OK now --Llez 06:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stèle juive (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue générale (Reviers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 16:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark IMHO --Poco a poco 08:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)  Done It's better ? Gzen92 07:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Overall better but you need now to reduce the highlights on the gull's head --Poco a poco 11:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 10:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancienne ligne de chemin de fer (Muttersholtz) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Thiébaut (Thann) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Engelbourg - œil de la sorcière (Thann) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Engelbourg - œil de la sorcière (Thann) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 07:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de l'Engelbourg - œil de la sorcière (Thann) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tortue rayonnée de Madagascar (Astrochelys radiata).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vautour moine (Aegypius monachus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 17:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent des Dominicains - cloître (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 08:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent des Dominicains - peinture (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent des Dominicains - peinture (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 05:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvent des Dominicains - copie d'une presse de Gutenberg (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue générale (Reviers) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken-Pis (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manneken-Pis et fontaine (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:55, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clocher vrillé de l'église (Niedermorschwihr) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:20, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé (Cygnus olor) - tête (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 12:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Écriteau (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:13, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (65).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (64).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logo Colmar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment good image, but needs to be properly categorized for QI. --MB-one 16:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC) : Done Gzen92 08:08, 9 November 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Alsace meurtrie, Gustave Doré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de la mairie (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hostellerie le Maréchal (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande roue (Colmar) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 11:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plat (noix de quasi de veau au jus truffe, étuvée de panais, pomme dauphines et chips croustillantes) (Munster) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Is "nearly veal" actually pork? -- Ikan Kekek 03:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC) :It's calf (the description is a Google translation...) Gzen92 07:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)  Comment So it's not nearly veal but veal. But what does "quasi de veau" really mean? -- Ikan Kekek 01:44, 22 December 2022 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: It's piece of meat, see https://www.la-viande.fr/cuisine-achat/cuisiner-viande/cuisiner-veau/morceaux/quasi-veau. Gzen92 07:14, 22 December 2022 (UTC)  Comment Thanks. Based on this, it appears to called the rump and maybe part of the round in the U.S. Whatever this pillow is copying appears to show a direct analogy of le quasi with the rump, so I think I will use the word "rump" in the English translation. -- Ikan Kekek 09:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Bugier (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julian Bugier (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Éric Strauman (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:12, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pancrace de Fléville-devant-Nancy (Meurthe-et-Moselle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a bit dark, but OK IMHO. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Fléville (Meurthe-et-Moselle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit underexposed. --C messier 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)  Done Better? Gzen92 13:39, 26 December 2022 (UTC) Maybe you brightened the sky too much, but the building in OK. --C messier 19:58, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)