User talk:GeorgHH: Difference between revisions
m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 14d) to User talk:GeorgHH/Archiv 9. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Jeffrey Epstein Image Deletion== |
|||
Hi GeorgHH, |
|||
I would like to repost the profile photo of Jeffrey Epstein which you deleted. The photo is indeed the copyright ownership of the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. However, the image may be used freely by the public with a creative common attribution: please see their website link that states this: http://www.jeffreyepstein.org/Contact.html |
|||
Could you remove the image from deletion or let me know the most effective way to do this? |
|||
Thank you! [[User:Turvill|Turvill]] ([[User talk:Turvill|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 16:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- |
<!-- |
||
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" |
||
Revision as of 16:29, 15 October 2013
Jeffrey Epstein Image Deletion
Hi GeorgHH,
I would like to repost the profile photo of Jeffrey Epstein which you deleted. The photo is indeed the copyright ownership of the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. However, the image may be used freely by the public with a creative common attribution: please see their website link that states this: http://www.jeffreyepstein.org/Contact.html
Could you remove the image from deletion or let me know the most effective way to do this?
Thank you! Turvill (talk) 16:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Images to be deleted but do have permission
Hi there, I got your notice that 3 images are to be deleted for lack of permission. However, I received an acceptance response email on 16 Feb from wiki editor "Alfred Neumann". Perhaps I didn't upload or tag them correctly? Please advise. Thanks LauraLeeT (talk) 14:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, please forward a received mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, so an OTRS-user can add the correct tag. For further information see OTRS please. --GeorgHH • talk 15:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
GeorgHH, I have re-sent to permissions-commons the acceptance email I received from wiki editor "Alfred Neumann" on 16 Feb. I have reviewed the OTRS procedures and believe I have done all the correct steps. Since I am making every effort to comply, please do not delete my images without advising what else is needed. Thanks, LauraLeeT (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- The clock is ticking and my images are set to be deleted in 2 days. I have re-sent the acceptance email with the three photos attached. However, the "deletion" warnings are still on my page. Please update me on the status of these images. Thanks, LauraLeeT (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo, I have marked the files with a notice, they will be not deleted for next 2-3 weeks. The deletion warnings on your talk page will not be deleted automatically. --GeorgHH • talk 06:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- The clock is ticking and my images are set to be deleted in 2 days. I have re-sent the acceptance email with the three photos attached. However, the "deletion" warnings are still on my page. Please update me on the status of these images. Thanks, LauraLeeT (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Inconsistency in description of Category:Swarovski
Hi. I'm trying to resolve an inconsistency between the English and German language descriptions of Category:Swarovski, whereby the German description says it is an Austrian company, whilst the English description says that it is a Swiss company. Looking at the history of the category, it looks like it was created by you with that inconsistency already in place. If you can help, please go to Category talk:Swarovski#Swiss?. TIA -- Chris j wood (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Kategorien redirekts
Hallo. Ich bin auf deine Seite gestossen, weil du vor Jahren ein redirekt der Kategorie Pelikan gemacht hast. Wenn ich deine Benutzerseite richtig verstehe, kategorisierst du, was ich auch oft mache. Daher meine Frage an dich: Gibt es eine Diskussionsseite wo allgemein über Sinn und Unsinn von Redirekts gesprochen wird? Im konkreten Fall führt der redirekt des deutschen Wortes Pelikan zu Category:Pelikan (company) mit dem hübschen Ergebnis, dass deutschsprachige Benutzer dort das Tier Pelikan einordnen, statt unter Category:Pelecanidae. Ein ähnlicher Fall scheint aktuell Category:Bows (Bogen zum Schießen, Geigenbögen). Ich weiss nicht, wie man das lösen kann, denn ich habe keine Ahnung wie Homonymkategorien funktionnieren, wenn einem automatisch Kategorievorschläge beim Hochladen gemacht werden. Die Umleitung zum exakten Kategorienamen ist automatisch, so dass man nicht unbedingt merkt, dass es die falsche Kategorie ist. Dazu kommt das Sprachproblem (wie heißt der Pelikan auf Latein, der Geigenbogen auf Englisch? Hast du eine Idee oder den Link zur besten Stelle so etwas zu diskutieren? Gruss Traumrune (talk) 13:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hallo Traumrune, eine spezielle Seite zum diskutieren von redirects kenne ich nicht. Geeignet scheinen mir die Diskussionsseiten Template talk:Category redirect oder Commons talk:Naming categories. Besser wäre aber wohl Commons:Village pump, da dort mehr Leute aktiv an den Diskussionen teilnehmen.
Ich selbst würde aus Category:Pelikan mittels {{Disambig}} eine Begriffsklärungsseite machen, die dann auf die richtigen Kategorien verlinkt.
--GeorgHH • talk 10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Ein Dankeschön
Hallo GeorgHH,
Wir haben eines deiner Bilder, in einen Artikel für das Hurraki Tagebuch, genutzt. Vielen Dank Dir hierfür.
De-adminship warning
Dear GeorgHH. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)