Category talk:Busts in the Gianicolo park (Rome)

Discssion about the "risk of copyvio" warning

I'm no expert but these didn't look like 20th century work to me and weren't they previously in the category 19th century busts. Maybe they were taken away in the war years then replaced.One pillar is decapitated.Souvenir hunting soldier I wondered. Notafly (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Of course the images most patently from the 1930s and 1940s were deleted already for copyvio... But if a bust was sculpted in 1899 by a sculptor who only died in 1949, it "looks" "19th century", but it is still a copyvio anyway. This is a normal case. Therefore, I insist, each authorship should be checked for and marked, before all busts may be considered "free for any use". Last but not least, vandalism is no cue for copyright status, please.

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 22:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)