Category talk:Mixed flowers

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


I'm not sure this should be in "unidentified" categories. It seems that even identified groups of multiple different flowers would be useful to be categorized as a mixed group. Anyone know why this category has been listed as unidentified? (I only put it back in Category:Unidentified flowers because it was in Category:Unidentified plants.) --Closeapple (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I agree. However, there is a need for a category of assorted and unidentified plants. Solution? --Averater (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
It seems to me that or Category:Unidentified mixed flowers or Category:Mixed unidentified flowers would make sense. But see what kind of "sense" happened at Category talk:Unidentified flowers, where people decided to merge all flowers into plants because having 2 categories would somehow cause images to be removed from one or the other, even after I said that a file could be in both. --Closeapple (talk) 10:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
I want to separate these kind of images:
For me this has nothing to do with if there are flowers in the image or not, but with the mixed part. I'd like some mixed plants category and a unidentified mixed plant category. Thereby maybe clumping together the last two (some and none identified). --Averater (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)