Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Santa Cruz y Santa Eulalia -- 2019 -- Barcelona, España.jpg

File:Catedral de la Santa Cruz y Santa Eulalia -- 2019 -- Barcelona, España.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2019 at 23:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Santa Cruz y Santa Eulalia -- 2019 -- Barcelona, España.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de la Santa Cruz y Santa Eulalia -- 2019 -- Barcelona, España.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info all by me, -- Alurín (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alurín (talk) 23:17, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I note that this was taken 4 minutes before sunrise, about 30 degrees away from being directly into the sun. Backlit scenes are great for silhouettes and getting a glow effect (e.g. on vegetation and hair), but in general they rob subjects of contrast and clarity. Also would prefer more resolution for an architectural shot with no mitigating factors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support the level of detail is very good, but I would prefer a larger image. The moderate level of light does not bother me. --Pine (✉) 02:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Boothsift 04:19, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support Because of the resolution, I don't mind that it's backlit. Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

• I think I voted too soon. I checked the EXIF data and this camera should be capable of 24 MP images. So either this is a crop from a larger image, or it's downsampled. If the latter, @Alurín: , would it be possible for you to supply the original-resolution picture? I will  Abstain till then. Cmao20 (talk) 23:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for responding to my question Alurín. Quality at full-res could be higher, but if I supported the smaller version at first, I will also  Support this version. Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry Alurín but I think the resolution should be higher. 3.6MP is acceptable for wildlife or something really hard to capture but for architecture where you can use a tripod and take your time, I'd like to see more megapixels. It's the only reason for me to oppose though, everything else is great. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Of course! tomorrow I upload the photograph with more resolution. --Alurín (talk) 01:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
  • better now? @Cmao20: @Pine: @Podzemnik: @King of Hearts: --Alurín (talk) 15:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 18:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The world belongs to those who get up early. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose But not to the photographer unless the sun is in the right place! Charles (talk) 17:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light is not great -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not just because of the light, but because of the oversharpening evident on the upper parts of the spire and finials. Daniel Case (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light per others. -- Colin (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Boothsift 03:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)