User talk:King of Hearts

Old talk can be found at /Archive.

Welcome to the Commons, King of Hearts!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Siebrand 21:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

193.207.130.29

In that case, can you delete yourself those four files so it's closed? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.207.130.29 (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot of 2024

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2024? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2025. Warmly, --Ailura (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tuang Za Khai.png

Hi King of Hearts. Since you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tuang Za Khai.png, perhaps you could take a look at User talk:Zo Phualva#File:Tuang Za Khai.png. The user in question is responding to a four-year-old DR notification, but the file in question seems to have been reuploaded in August 2024. I can't tell whether there posting about the same file or a different file with the same name, but the file currently seems to be COM:INUSE. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:02, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

It is a different image. Given that the uploader has stated in words that he is the creator and the file is in use on Simple Wikipedia, I think we can leave it be. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Translation notification: Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025

Hello King of Hearts,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to Spanish and Chinese on Wikimedia Commons. The page Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore 2025 is available for translation. You can translate it here:

• translate to Spanish
• translate to Chinese

The priority of this page is medium. The deadline for translating this page is 2025-01-31.

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international media campaign running from February 1st to March 31st, and we kindly seek your assistance in translating the project pages into your local language. Your efforts will help make the campaign more accessible and meaningful for local communities. Thank you for your time and invaluable support.

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

To unsubscribe or to change your notification preferences for translations, please visit Special:TranslatorSignup.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 15:53, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Question related to daily upload count for A1Cafel

Are cropped photo uploads a part of the daily 10 upload count? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 00:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I haven't given much thought to this scenario, but let's say no for now; we could always revisit if it starts to be abused. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Ok and thank you. -- Ooligan (talk) 10:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Question

Hi. Can you at least tell me why I was topic banned so I have something to base an unban appeal on if I ever feel like doing one? The last time I checked admins are suppose to tell people why they are being sanctioned and it doesn't seem like you did that when you topic banned me. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

The consensus of participants at the ban discussion was that the vast majority of your filings on admin boards were vexatious and unproductive. I think any unban appeal will need to be preceded by a genuine improvement in civility. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

If your talking about filings before the one that led to the topic ban, I don't think I had reported anyone in at least a couple of months and the last person I reported was for obvious socking. I hadn't filed any "vexatious" filings in quit a while and it wasn't a chronic issue when you topic banned me though. Although I'd grant that the two reports after the initial one were probably overkill. Yann warned me about it on my talk page though and I told him I wouldn't open anymore ANU reports going forward, which I repeated in the ANU request. So I'm not really sure what exactly I'm suppose to be appealing in that regard that wasn't already dealt with before you topic banned me. Let alone what the point in the topic ban was to begin with since it was a non-issue at that point.

As for the civility issues, I just did a search for a couple of swearwords on the village pump. There was 85 uses of two of them in 10 years. No one seems to have ever been sanctioned, corrected, called out, or really faced any other consequences for swearing. So I'm not really sure what "civility" you think I need to improve. I already said I wouldn't swear again in the ANU report, but it's clearly a non-issue and I'm not going to "improve" something that isn't a problem to begin with. So can you clarify exactly what you think I need to improve with my behavior and what purpose the topic ban has that wasn't already dealt with by Yann leaving me the warning? Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Although I can try to give you advice, ultimately the community is the final judge of your actions, so you can try appealing if you don't think the topic ban is warranted. But I would urge you to keep an open mind about feedback from others and not get defensive every time; you should be prepared for the possibility that the appeal might not go in the direction you wanted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

OK. I don't really feel like appealing the topic ban at this point. I'll take your advice into account when I do though. But can you at least allow for an exception to it for voting on RfAs since it had nothing to do with the ANU complaint and isn't an area I have issues in? --Adamant1 (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators/Requests is not a subpage of Commons:Administrators' noticeboard, so it is not covered by the topic ban to begin with. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Review

It has been four months since the restriction, and I think I have no serious problematic uploads over the past two months, so I I wish to increase the number of images that can upload per day. A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

You can make an appeal at COM:ANU and let them know I sent you there. Since you've already been banned from F2C twice in the past, I just don't want to get into a situation where your restrictions are loosened and then months later another complaint is filed against you. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:21, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm not asking a total lift of the restriction, just an increase of the number of images that can upload per day (let say 20?), still need to go through AN? --A1Cafel (talk) 14:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I don't have time to monitor all of your uploads, and I worry that a few months later you'll ask for 40, then 80, and eventually somebody will notice an issue and at that point you might end up being indefinitely banned. You were very close to that last time. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

This will be my last time to ask you for the review, no more further appeal will be made to you since then. Perhaps I may ask for some opinion if I made an appeal to AN, as I think this may not be the time to make a full appeal. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Moreover, I think around 20 uploads per day is a reasonable amount that strikes a balance between the amount of uploading and your concerns. I am confident that I won't have big issues with that amount. Hopefully this can address your concern. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Any response from that? It has been a week already. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:45, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Again, please file an appeal at AN. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

I think my respond likely to address your concern. You worry about I may appeal again and again, for increasing my amounts of upload. As I said before, if you agree this review, I won't make further appeal on your talkpage. Is there any other concern that you still have? BTW, I have receive a request that help import photo about other events, I just can't do that due to the 10 uploads restriction per day. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

I have started a thread: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel upload restriction review. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Park Berkeley September 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:49, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Park Berkeley September 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 19:59, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! People's Park Berkeley September 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UC Berkeley September 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UC Berkeley September 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus delawarensis Banff September 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two Jack Lake Banff September 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two Jack Lake Banff September 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two Jack Lake Banff September 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 11:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:20, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ツredmyname 💬 10:17, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ツredmyname 💬 10:17, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florstein 08:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted ccw. Shocking Destruction --Milseburg 10:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC) Fixed. --King of Hearts 09:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC) Good quality. --Milseburg 14:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted ccw. Shocking Destruction --Milseburg 10:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC) Fixed. --King of Hearts 09:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC) Good quality. --Milseburg 14:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks November 2018 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)